Pages

A universe of beauty, mystery and wonder

A universe of beauty, mystery and wonder
©http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/ UNAUTHORIZED USE AND/OR DUPLICATION OF THIS BLOG'S MATERIAL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. EXCERPTS AND LINKS MAY BE USED, PROVIDED THAT FULL AND CLEAR CREDIT IS GIVEN TO OTTERS AND SCIENCE NEWS BLOGSPOT WITH APPROPRIATE AND SPECIFIC DIRECTION TO THE ORIGINAL CONTENT. --- THE FACTS AND OPINIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG ARE HERE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS AND OPINIONS OF THIS BLOG'S ADMINISTRATOR.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

THE US STATE DEPARTMENT ENDORSES APARTHEID - AGAINST ISRAELI JEWS

State Department's tacit message to Israel: 
Jews, how do you dare build and live outside your ghetto!
 
Note:  The following article was written a couple of days before a top White House official anonymously called the Israeli PM a coward and chickensh*t. 
 
Why does the State Department endorse
 the Palestinian fight to exclude Jews?
 

October 27, 2014

Ancient Jerusalem - Israel's capital - Kotel at sunrise
Muslims arrived as conquerors and occupiers - The State Dept. sides with them.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu made headlines around the world again with his assertion in the Knesset that he will defend the right of Jews to live in any part of his country’s capital.
 
The statement and the expedited plans to build 1,000 new apartments in Jerusalem is drawing the usual condemnations from the international community as both an unnecessary provocation and a new obstacle to Middle East peace.
 
But what Israel’s critics are missing is that the threats and actual violence coming from Palestinians about Jewish homes, is the best indicator that the sort of mutual coexistence that is essential to peace is currently not in the cards.


As the New York Times reports:
If Israel wants to live in a peaceful society, they need to take steps that will reduce tensions,” Jen Psaki, the State Department spokeswoman, told reporters in a briefing. “Moving forward with this sort of action would be incompatible with the pursuit of peace.”
The Israeli move is being blasted as yet another example of Netanyahu worsening the already tense relationship between Israel and the United States.
 
But Psaki’s willingness to jump on Netanyahu after repeatedly refusing in the last week to condemn statements from Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas in which he openly incited violence against Israelis, the State Department stand could easily be interpreted as an implicit approval of the PA position.
 
If so, then it should be understood that what the United States is doing here is saying that Palestinians are in the right when they demand that Jews be kept out of certain parts of Jerusalem.
 
But far from disturbing the peace, the idea of building new apartments in existing Jewish neighborhoods in the city or moving into mixed or Arab majority areas not only repudiates the formula of territorial swaps that President Obama has repeatedly endorsed but also reinforces the notion that the Palestinian state that the State Department envisions will be one in which no Jew is allowed to live.
 
That means the U.S. is backing a vision of a Palestinian apartheid state that is itself incompatible with any notion of peace and rationalizing the recent wave of Arab violence against Jewish targets in Jerusalem.
 
Just this last week, another terrorist incident in Jerusalem took the lives of two persons including an infant. Others were injured in incidents in which Palestinians threw Molotov cocktails — gasoline firebombs — at soldiers and police seeking to restore order after violent protests about Jews moving into the Silwan section of the city.
 
One such bomb thrower — a 14-year-old Palestinian who was born in New Orleans — was killed by Israeli troops while in the process of trying to incinerate them or motorists on a highway.
 
But the State Department didn’t acknowledge that the deceased was killed while committing what would be considered an act of terrorism were the target Americans.
 
Instead, it merely extended condolences to the family of the teenager and to demand explanations from Israel about his death.
 
In doing so, it seems insensible to the fact that by continuing to back up Abbas’ complaints, it is helping to incite the violence that is taking lives on both sides and making the prospects of peace even more remote.
 
From the point of the view of Netanyahu’s detractors, today’s announcement and the refusal of Israeli authorities to stop Jews from moving into properties that they have legally purchased in East Jerusalem is upsetting the status quo in the city.
 
This is not just a function of the ongoing U.S. refusal to recognize that it is neither possible nor desirable to return to the status quo on June 4, 1967 when half of the city was under illegal Jordanian occupation.
 
The U.S. position also seems to accept the idea that Palestinians have a right to be angry over Jews moving into both Jewish majority neighborhoods and Arab majority neighborhoods in parts of Jerusalem. But both positions are problematic.
 
On the one hand, the U.S treating more apartments going up in areas that, dating back to the Clinton administration, the U.S. has acknowledged would be retained by Israel in the event of a peace agreement, as either provocative or an obstacle to peace makes no sense.
 
Why should the Palestinians be encouraged to make an issue out of Jews living in places that no one thinks will ever part of a Palestinian state?
 
In doing so, Washington is inciting Abbas to use the existence of places where hundreds of thousands of Jews currently live as an excuse not to negotiate with Israel or even to countenance more acts of terror.
 
Just as mistaken is the idea that Jews moving into Arab neighborhoods is a good reason for Palestinians to get riled up.
 
If Abbas had accepted any of the peace deals that Israel has previously offered, those places would even now be part of the Palestinian state that he professes to want but refuses to do anything to make it a reality.
 
Had he done so then or even if he were willing to do so now as part of a deal in which the Palestinians agreed to end the conflict for all time and recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state alongside them no matter where its borders are drawn, then it wouldn’t matter if there were a few Jews living in Silwan or anywhere else.
 
Since Arabs are currently allowed to live in West Jerusalem as equal citizens under Israeli law why shouldn’t the Palestinians extend the same offer to the so-called settlers who have moved into apartments in the shadow of the Old City walls?
 
The reason is that their goal is to create a Jew free state whose purpose will be to perpetuate the conflict against Israel, not end it.
 
The state they envision will be, as I wrote last week, the true apartheid state in the Middle East in which parts of Jerusalem will become legal no go zones for Jews in much the same way, white South Africans made it illegal for blacks to live in parts of their own country.
 
It is exactly for this perverted vision that Palestinians are taking to the streets to lob lethal weapons at Jews while the State Department treats the perpetrators as innocent victims and the actual victims as aggressors.
 
That is the racism that the U.S. is endorsing by making an issue of Jews building in Jerusalem. Peace doesn’t have a chance until the Palestinians stop being offended by Jews living in the holy city or thinking they are justified in fighting for an apartheid vision in which they are excluded.

Source:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2014/10/27/why-does-the-state-department-endorse-palestinian-fight-to-exclude-jews/

RELATED

Does Islam have a true connection to Jerusalem?  Prophet Mohammed never set foot on that city.
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/04/does-islam-have-true-connection-to.html

Recommended:  Short and factual video about the fundamental significance of Jerusalem and Temple Mount for Jews and its very weak link to Islam - in history and doctrine  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU9CauJP4Pg

White House top official calls the Israeli PM a coward and chicken manure
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/10/white-house-threatened-israel-with.html

There won't be any US apology
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/10/top-white-house-official-who-called.html


More information on Jerusalem
 
Unusual pictures of Jerusalem today
 
 
History of Jerusalem
 
The liberation of Jerusalem from the Jordanian occupation in 1967
 
The ongoing dispute over Jerusalem and Temple Mount - Historical background
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=7&x_issue=4&x_article=1404
 
Virtual tour of the Western Wall hidden tunnels (text and pictures)
 
Virtual tour (video) of the ancient Jewish Temple of Jerusalem (destroyed by the Romans)
 
Does Islam have a true connection to Jerusalem?
Prophet Mohammed never set foot in that city.  Islam is the real occupier
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/04/does-islam-have-true-connection-to.html

Even the Koran admits Jerusalem belongs to the Jews
Israel is mentioned eight times in the Koran and there is not a single mention that it belongs to Arabs or Muslims. Whenever there is a reference to the Land of Israel and to whom it belongs, the Koran points to the Jewish people.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/177319#.U2UNhpsU-M9
 
Muslim scholar admits Israel belongs to the Jews
 
Recommended: 
Short and factual video about the fundamental significance of Jerusalem and Temple Mount for Jews and its very weak link to Islam - in history and doctrine  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU9CauJP4Pg

****************************************************************************

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments are always appreciated, but please do not include links.