* Mysterious, unknown creatures live inside of us.... This is not a horror film script, but the result of a scientific study.
* And when you think of how bacteria (particularly gut bacteria) influence our brain and emotions, then we have ask the disturbing question: Who is in charge of us?
Stanford University: A survey of DNA fragments circulating in the blood suggests the microbes living within us are vastly more diverse than previously known. In fact, 99 percent of that DNA has never been seen before.
A great deal of mystery DNA has been found in the human gut. Of all the non-human DNA fragments the team gathered, 99 percent of them failed to match anything in existing genetic databases.
A new survey of DNA fragments circulating in human blood suggests our bodies contain vastly more diverse microbes than anyone previously understood. What's more, the overwhelming majority of those microbes have never been seen before, let alone classified and named, Stanford researchers report August 22 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Continue reading this article and one on how gut bacteria affect the brain, including the incidence of AUTISM
The causal link between vaccines and subsequent ailments in adults and children has long been a subject regarded as taboo by the medical establishment, government, and media.
There is solid evidence by reputable scientists that several illnesses and disorders have their origin in vaccines. But the pharmaceutical industry is so powerful that scientists and researchers who insist on exposing the truth are too often censored, discredited, ridiculed, and even persecuted out of their jobs. Big money is at stake.
Politicians who are too dependent on industry donations won't do anything that will upset the most powerful of them - so in the case of vaccine risks, the CDC and other government agencies appear to follow directions from the pharmaceutical industry, to the detriment of the population they are supposed to protect.
And why would there be even an unofficial ban on discussing the subject? Recently actor and film maker Robert De Niro - who has an autistic child - was 'persuaded' to withdraw his film VAXXED from the Tibeca Film Festival.
On this interview De Niro clarifies he is not anti-vaccine. He is for SAFE vaccines.
On July 29, 2015, Congressman Bill Posey presented details of omission and destruction of study records by colleagues of Dr. William Thompson, senior scientist at the CDC. Dr. Thompson admitted that the destroyed 2004 study results showed a connection between the MMR vaccination and autism in African-American infants.
VIDEO - FLORIDA CONGRESSMAN BILL POSEY - CDC WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSES VACCINE COVERUP
It also turns out that the Huffington Post censored in article that referred to the documentary film Vaxxed. As Tyler Durden comments:
The first thing that strikes you upon reading the article is that only a small portion of the piece even discusses VAXXED, and yet a mere endorsement of this documentary by a veteran writer who’s been publishing on the Huffington Post for nearly a decade is enough to elicit an article ban. Which leads us to a couple of followup questions. Is this how the Huffington Post treats its longtime contributors? Are writers not allowed to share their personal opinions about a movie? Or is the issue this movie in particular? Why is this one documentary so threatening?
"Why Our Children Should Hate Us" - The Lance Simmens Article Banned By The Huffington Post
Although Lance Simmens has been intimately involved in public life for several decades, you’ve probably never heard of him. As such, a little introduction is needed.
Continue reading, including links to related articles
Animals deserve our respect. They are creatures of God with sensitivity, intelligence, and so much love to give. We should do all we can to promote their protection in a world where animals are treated with so much cruelty. The following story is about a therapy cat, but all our pets can be therapy animals. With their love and loveliness they help keep us sane.
The heartwarming story of a five-year old girl with autism and her therapy cat.
Iris Grace, the incredibly talented 5-year-old girl with autism who paints beautiful pictures, has a behind-the-scenes helper who’s also worthy of praise – that’s Thula, her therapeutic cat.
Thula, who is almost 1 year old, is a Maine Coon. This breed is known as the intelligent and gentle giant of the cat world and though she’s still small and young, Thula does not disappoint.
Her gentle and compassionate character is especially important for Iris, a young girl growing up with autism;
“Thula has lowered [Iris'] daily anxieties in life and keeps Iris calm,” Iris’ mother, Arabella Carter-Johnson, told Bored Panda, “but equally has the effect of encouraging her to be more social. She will talk more to Thula, saying little phrases like ‘sit cat.’”
A new study published in the September 2014 volume of the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology reveals a significant correlation between autism disorder (AD) and MMR, Varicella (chickenpox) and Hepatitis-A vaccines.
Using statistical analysis and data from the US Government, UK, Denmark and Western Australia, scientists at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) found that increases in autistic disorder correspond with the introduction of vaccines using human fetal cell lines and retroviral contaminants.
Even more alarming, Dr Theresa Deisher, lead scientist and SCPI founder noted that, “Not only are the human fetal contaminated vaccines associated with autistic disorder throughout the world, but also with epidemic childhood leukemia and lymphomas.”
Their study comes on the heels of recent breaking news that the CDC deliberately withheld evidence of the significant increase in autism among African-American boys who were vaccinated prior to 36 months of age.
So it should come as no surprise that the FDA has known for decades about the dangers of insertional mutagenesis by using the human fetal cell lines and yet, they chose to ignore it. Instead of conducting safety studies they regulated the amount of human DNA that could be present in a vaccine to no greater than 10ng.
Unfortunately, Dr. Deisher’s team discovered that the fetal DNA levels ranged anywhere from 142ng – 2000ng per dose, way beyond the so-called “safe” level.
