The psychological and physical differences between men and women have always been obvious, celebrated, and unquestioned - until now, when a movement borne out of political correctness and relativism gone mad has succeeded in legalizing and normalizing the idea that gender is a personal choice.
Ideas with no basis in science tend to disappear with time and become fringe and a source of amusement - such as the idea of a flat earth.
However, the normalization of what is essentially an aberration is causing a great deal of distress in families, as teachers implement a curriculum that indoctrinates even very young children into questioning their own normal sexuality.
Worse, the mere public debate on this subject has been stifled in Canada and in institutions all over the United States, and characterized as "hate speech".
A lecturer at Wilfred Laurier University in Canada is facing an investigation after she showed a clip in class of University of Toronto Professor Jordan Peterson speaking on the issue of transgender politics. Jordan Peterson is a mild-mannered professor, not a right wing radical, just a fierce defender of free speech. He refuses to cower to university administrators' demand to address people according to their gender choice. Read more further down this page.
Authorities instil fear on anyone wanting to question the now official line that it is a hate crime to use traditional male or female gender pronouns when addressing a person who has chosen an alternate gender. In other words, if you address a man wearing a dress as "sir" you are a hate criminal.
Parallel to this social debate there is another issue that needs to be addressed: how estrogen pollution (from excreted birth control pills) of drinking water is producing the feminization of men, and how soy products that mimic estrogen are suspected of the same result.
Men's sperm count has dropped precipitously in the last few decades. Something nefarious is going on that is decreasing male fertility and increasing homosexuality. See references further on this page.
The idea that men and women are equally suited for all jobs is absurd.
If you were hiring someone to look after your babies you would tend to choose a woman rather than a man, even if both are equally qualified, because of women's nurturing instinct.
If you had any say in the hiring of firefighters, you would hire a capable man rather than a woman to be able to pull an injured person out of a burning house if needed.
But political correctness wants us to put logic and biology aside and to say that men and women are just as capable of doing ANY sort of job.
Evolution built males and females differently for the sake of our own survival and that of our species.
Maps of neural circuitry show women's brains are suited to social skills and memory, men's perception and co-ordination
By Ian Sample, The Guardian
Scientists have drawn on nearly 1,000 brain scans to confirm what many had surely concluded long ago: that stark differences exist in the wiring of male and female brains.
Maps of neural circuitry showed that on average women's brains were highly connected across the left and right hemispheres, in contrast to men's brains, where the connections were typically stronger between the front and back regions.
Continue reading this and other related articles and watch VIDEOS
If you look at many of the current abuses perpetrated by human rights movements, you'll remember that they started out as well-intentioned and rather minor legislation to protect the vulnerable.
Example 1: the pro-homosexual movement started out to prevent discrimination in housing and in jobs. It moved on rapidly to demand gay marriage, and now the normalization, teaching, and promotion of homosexual behaviour and transgenderism in schools - under the guise of sexual education.
The victims have become the victimizers by jeopardizing the mental health and future of millions of children as young as 6 years old, who are indoctrinated with ideas about sex and depraviy that their young minds cannot process correctly.
If you raise your voice in protest, you are accused of being homophobic, and maybe a hate criminal as well. In Ontario, Canada, the government can take your child away if you object to your six year old identifying with the opposite sex.
Example2:The left promotes unfettered mass migration from the third world into the west, and whoever objects to it is called a racist and a Nazi. The UK Labour government of Tony Blair promised that migration from third world countries would be minimal. He predicted just 15,000 a year, but within two years some 600,000 were in the country. Today there are millions, with at least 35,000 of them identified by police as dangerous jihadis. The equivalent of a whole new town of migrants is added to Britain each week.
Example 3 - Protecting minorities? Any dissent against EU immigration policy or denunciation of Islam's beliefs that contradict western values is of course denounced as racist, and the individual may be charged with a hate crime. UK politician Nigel Farage was arrested and charged with a hate crime a couple of years ago for quoting Winston Churchill's book The River War, because the former PM's views on Islam are regarded as politically incorrect by today's standards.
European Union countries have been the most radical in passing laws and regulations selectively muzzling freedom of speech, particularly when it criticizes Islam. (Imams preach genocidal hatred from mosques, but that is tolerated.) EU authorities not only ban what the government and the left defines as hate speech. Publishing some historical photos, for example, can also land you in jail because they may show Islam in an unfavorable light. Here is a recent example, out of many similar ones that protect Islam (but not Christianity).
To jail for posting historical photo:
German citizen Michael Stürzenbergerwas arrested and then sentenced to six months in prison for posting a photo of the Palestinian Haj Amin Al Husseini with Adolf Hitler.
In fact, it is no secret that Hitler and the Mufti worked together on expediting the Final Solution to include all Jews living in the Middle East.
This Nazi-Palestinian alliance and collaboration was so strong that the Mufti himself headed a Nazi SS Division of mostly Bosnian Muslims, later on charged with perpetrating gruesome mass killings in Eastern Europe.
Photos of the Palestinian Mufti of Jerusalem with Hitler and his cohorts have been around for decades, but are avoided by media sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. Until only recently even Israeli politicians avoided delving into the subject of Nazi-Palestinian alliance, until PM Netanyahu finally said it out loud on a speech that caused dismay on the left. The obvious question is how can the PM be in favor of portioning Israel to create a terror state for Arab Nazi collaborators? Germany had to pay reparations, but the Palestinians feel entitled to the gift of a country of their own on ancient biblical Jewish land.
The war on freedom of speech comes to America, with help from Trump
Americans are already subjected to restrictions on what they publish on social media, since the monopolies of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube can censor not only what they consider offensive, but they can also censor mainstream conservative views.
Americans are still proud of their First Amendment, knowing that freedom of speech is protected, and that any abuses can be dealt with by using laws concerning libel, obscenity, etc. What they are slowly realizing is that they are being betrayed by politicians conspiring to restrict freedom of speech to ever higher levels, all in the name of tolerance.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Breitbart just published the following commentary with great alarm:
TRUMPSigns ‘Anti-Hate’ Resolution, a Major Assault on America’s First Amendment
By Raheem Kassam,Editor in Chief of Breitbart London, and author of
According to the Associated Press reportsPresident Donald Trump has signed a resolution condemning white supremacists, neo-Nazis and other hate groups following a white-nationalist rally in Virginia that descended into deadly violence. The resolution also urged Trump and his administration to speak out against hate groups that espouse racism, anti-Semitism and white supremacy.
That’s not entirely accurate. In fact it’s a pretty thoughtless and likely intentional misinterpretation of the breadth of this resolution and its real world implications.
The resolution expresses “support for the Charlottesville community”, which is great, but then demands the President rejects “White nationalists, White supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups” and urges him and his cabinet to “use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups”.
Were it simply this symbolic, I wouldn’t be banging on about it. Were epithets like “white nationalist” or “white supremacist” not used against people like me, and sites like Breitbart.com, it may be excusable — and mockable — as simple virtue signaling.
But it’s not just symbolic. The resolution demands “the President and the President’s Cabinet… use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups” and requires “the heads of other Federal agencies… improve the reporting of hate crimes and… emphasize the importance of the collection, and… reporting to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, of hate crime data by State and local agencies”.
Continue readingthis article, see references, and related items
University of California at Berkeley, home of the free speech movement in the 1960s erupts in mass violence to silence Milo, a libertarian gay activist. Leftist American students are now violent defenders of the Islamic ideology that executes homosexuals, oppresses everyone, and perpetrates violence against women all over the Muslim world.
Elite California school forced to cancel speech by Trump-supporter Jewish gay activist Milo Yiannopoulos as students set off fireworks at cops, tear down barricades and set the campus ablaze in protest
Violent protests have broken out at UC Berkeley campus over plans for Beitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos to give a speech
Event has been cancelled and Yiannopoulos has since been evacuated
Reports of protesters setting off fireworks, tearing down barricades, setting fires and throwing rocks at the university
Police reportedly responded by opening fire with non-lethal bullets
Campus has been placed on lockdown and students ordered to take shelter
Visit was last stop on the 32 year old Milo's anti-political correctness tour of US campuses
Milo is unpopular among the left for his denunciation of Muslim countries death penalty against homosexuals, and various forms of violence against women.
Leftists have repeatedly tried to force the cancellation of his speeches, even using violence to do it.
Universities have tried to pre-empt his talks by imposing thousands of dollars fees "to cover security expenses".
Milo and others noticed that police appeared to just let the riot happen
The Soviet regime dictated harsh rules and established censorship. However people remained normal human beings. They laughed at authorities, composed jokes about Brezhnev, made satirical films in spite of the censorship, and learned to read newspapers between the lines. This primarily referred to intellectuals. Western cultural totalitarianism succeeded in doing much more. It turned people into sterile zombies, brainwashed them, perverted the minds of men and women, and subdued intellectuals that have responsibility for the future of their people. (Alexander Maistrovoy)
This post includes a column by former Soviet citizen Alex Maistrovoy, and one by Daniel Greenfield. They both call attention to alarming trends in western society to muzzle free speech, and to dismantle basic notions of morality and human rights. Universities are now at the forefront of these trends.
All our lives we have perceived political differences along a left-right divide. We put liberals, anarchists, progressives, socialists, and Communists on the left, and freedom-loving people and conservatives on the right. If you happen to support the left, you could add racists, capitalists, and fascists on the right,
That was a convenient formula to simplify our world view. But this divide has been profoundly deceptive. The truth is that there was always a blending of the extremes, and a common ground in the middle. One salient example is the case of China, where Communism, capitalism, and plain tyranny combine in a single system ruling over almost one and a half billion people.
While the left purports to uphold ideals of democracy, equality, compassion, justice, and so on - today it has wholeheartedly allied itself with the most cruel and repressive ideology in the world: Islam.
Leftists denounce western nations' crimes, but are silent about the 270 million non-Muslims killed by Islam 's holy wars since the 7th century, with the victims being mostly Hindu and African. Details here:
This leftist alliance with tyrannical regimes is nothing new. For decades the left allied itself with the Soviet regime, although it was engaged in atrocious oppression, persecution and genocide.
Following the Soviet example, the left now supports Muslim Palestinian terrorists, while waging a vicious propaganda war against the more democratic and tolerant Israel. The left also agitates for increased Muslim migration into the west, in spite of nefarious consequences for the general population, as it is very clear from the European experience.
The hypocrisy of the left is dramatically exposed in their blaming capitalism alone for depredations against the environment, while they turn a blind eye to the much worse effects of Communism.
The Soviet regime left a trail of environmental disasters in its wake, and China is to this day engaged in the industrial poisoning of air, water, and land. We see recurrent images of crowds wearing surgical masks wading through thick clouds of poisonous smog in Chinese cities where air pollution is completely out of control.
The conservative brand has been seriously fraying, as left and right are in cahoots in western parliaments for the promotion of the same agenda: increased Muslim immigration, greater restrictions of basic human rights, and the expansion of globalism through trade agreements and elimination of national borders.
In Europe left and right are behind Angela Merkel's replacement of the native European population with millions of imported migrants from the Middle East and Africa.
In the United States the Republican establishment, or RINOS (Republicans In Name Only), oppose Donald Trump's plan to curtail immigration from Muslim countries and from south of the border. These powerful Republican politicians have worked hand in hand with Democrats in eroding immigration laws and the security of the country.
So it is time to take a fresh look at politics and ideologies, and see beyond political parties' self-identification and slogans, in order to expose their true agendas.
After centuries of fighting each other, the two apparent opposites have finally and openly come together to promote common goals.
They include:
- the weakening and eventual disappearance of nation states for the formation of multinational blocks that can be more easily controlled (such as the European Union),
- the active replacement of European civilization and races with the imported values from backward nations under the cover of 'diversity', and
- the government-imposed suppression of free speech under the rubric of 'political correctness' and anti-racism. While the globalists' intolerant allies enjoy official protection, their victims are not only sacrificed but demonized as well.
Those opposing the globalist agenda have been characterized as populist, racists, fascists, and other epithets that demonize them to the point where calls for their assassination have become mainstream and well tolerated by social media giants such as Facebook and Twitter.
I have posted a column by author Alexander Maistrovoy, a former citizen of the Soviet Union now living in the west. He knows first hand what is like to endure tyranny, fear, self-censorship, and the constant threat of arrest. But he finds the current cultural tyranny in the US and Europe much worse for society than the Soviet political dictatorship.
I have also posted one by columnist Daniel Greenfield, who exposes the degree of censorship being imposed on US university students. Institutions that used to allow the free flow of ideas now are at the forefront of censorship and mind control.
But before you read those interesting columns, watch this video where average New Yorkers express their full support for the notion that living under US martial law is better than allowing Trump to become president.
This informal poll of people passing by Times Square shows how uninformed and vulnerable to globalists' emotional manipulations they are. The Orwellian Trump-Bad/Hillary-Good slogan was swallowed whole by millions of even university-educated citizens.
VIDEO -AFDI ON THE STREET: New Yorkers Prefer Martial Law to Trump, Agree with Rosie O'Donnell
Rosie O’Donnell recently called for Obama to impose martial law and postpone the inauguration of Donald Trump until the president-elect could be prosecuted for crimes she did not name
Comedy of Terrors - Western Progressive Thinking Against Nature and Man
Want to see Anti-Utopia? Look at the stand of mind of the Western establishment.
By Alexander Maistrovoy
Author of recently published “Agony of Hercules
or a Farewell to Democracy" (Notes of a Stranger)
After Trump’s win, a huge part of enlightened America was plunged into mourning. Students were crying, teachers canceled lectures to calm them down, a “hotline” started working to help desperate people.
In the USSR such mass hysteria happened only after Stalin’s death, when people cried thinking that it was the end of the world. What brought American students to such despair? They are unlikely to be able to explain it, but it’s a very dangerous syndrome of mass insanity.
It’s a symptom that the cultural totalitarianism of the West is firstly far more effective than the Soviet political totalitarianism and secondly – it is much more deadly and poisonous. It has suppressed the will, consciousness and emotions of people – what Soviet party members didn’t achieve. Continue reading
This Canadian blog is not pro-Donald Trump, or pro-anybody in the US election. But the violent attack on freedom of speech in western countries should be disturbing to all of us, no matter what our political beliefs may be.
VIDEO - Brian Lilley of Rebel Media: Media GUILTY of shameful double standard
"STOP HATE"? - These men look like brownshirt stormtroopers- Quite intimidating. No chance of rational conversation with them.
The well-organized campaign to silence Donald Trump and intimidate his supporters is impressive in its violence and viciousness and made headlines. However, the same mob rule against freedom of speech has been going on in public places and in university campuses all over America and other western countries for some time, ignored by the media. The main targets for hate and violenceon campuses these days are pro-Israel students and speakers, and Jews in general, for being perceived to be indirectly associated with the State of Israel - although many Jewish students are far-left themselves, pro-Arab and anti-Israel.
Pro-Life and Pro-Israel groups have been violently intimidated into silence - while university administrators look on this violence and violation of freedom of speech with indifference. The media ignores it.
Not even low key pro-life and pro-Israel visual informational displays on campuses are allowed by student governments because, allegedly, they offend the students' sensitivities. All the while the most egregious anti-Semitic speech and propaganda is considered perfectly acceptable. Just being Jewish at university campuses is enough to unleash unprovoked violence and hate.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Frontpage Magazine: Progressive Brownshirts
Leftist protesters are making violence and intimidation a regular feature of the American public discourse. And the public submits.
Ted Cruz and others who blamed Trump for the Chicago mob violence don't realize that they too will be silenced by leftist brownshirts
Although this (anti-Trump) violence and brutalization of political opponents is a new phenomenon in American politics, it has a historical antecedent: the Nazi Brownshirts.
In The Coming of the Third Reich, historian Richard J. Evans explains how, in the early days of National Socialist Germany, Stormtroopers (Brownshirts) “organized campaigns against unwanted professors in the local newspapers [and] staged mass disruptions of their lectures.”
Out of control anti-Trump protestor at the Chicago rally
To express dissent from Nazi positions became a matter of taking one’s life into one’s hands. The idea of people of opposing viewpoints airing their disagreements in a civil and mutually respectful manner was gone. One was a Nazi, or one was silent (and fearful).
That is just the kind of public arena that the Left has been trying to bring to the United States for years.
Years ago, the Democratic Party as a whole, along with the entire Leftist establishment, adopted the Alinskyite tactic of ridiculing, mocking and smearing their foes instead of engaging them on the level of ideas. Leftists today routinely portray their opponents as simultaneously stupid and evil, idiotic but crafty; it’s practically a reflex.
They succeeded in silencing Trump at the Chicago rally Who's next?
The shutdown of Trump’s rally in Chicago, however, takes this one step farther.
Trump supporters leaving the arena in Chicago after the Left-fascists had forced cancellation of the Trump rally last Friday experienced that firsthand.
AP reported that “the protesters closed in on the building, obstructing most of the exits just as Trump supporters began filing out.
The Trump supporters had little choice but to push through the anti-Trump crowds that parted only slightly, yelling, ‘Racists go home!’…Trump supporter Bill Vail said he walked through a gauntlet of protesters who cursed at him as he pushed through holding his 9-year-old daughter’s hand. She cried, he said.”
Continue reading and see links to related articles, including an update with the list of groups preparing a spring uprising against the Trump candidacy.
Oxford University Press says they are avoiding mentioning pork and pigs in books to avoid offending Muslims and Jews, but Jews have never taken offense at such things — it was only in Saudi Arabia, for example, that censors covered over a pig character in a children’s book with a big black marker.
The existence of the publisher's guidelines emerged after a television discussion on free speech in the wake of the Paris attacks.
Speaking on Radio 4's Today programme, presenter Jim Naughtie said: "I've got a letter here that was sent out by OUP to an author doing something for young people.
"Among the things prohibited in the text that was commissioned by OUP was the following: Pigs plus sausages, or anything else which could be perceived as pork.
"Now, if a respectable publisher, tied to an academic institution, is saying you've got to write a book in which you cannot mention pigs because some people might be offended, it’s just ludicrous. It is just a joke."
PEPPA PIG
Muslim Labour MP Khalid Mahmood said: "I absolutely agree. That’s absolute utter nonsense. And when people go too far, that brings the whole discussion into disrepute."
The publishing rules have since been ridiculed amid doubts either Muslims or Jews would be offended by mention of farm animals in a children’s book.
Tory MP Philip Davies said: "How on earth can anyone find the word 'pig' or 'pork' offensive?
"No word is offensive. It is the context in which it is used that is offensive."
A spokesman for OUP said: "OUP's commitment to its mission of academic and educational excellence is absolute.
"Our materials are sold in nearly 200 countries, and as such, and without compromising our commitment in any way, we encourage some authors of educational materials respectfully to consider cultural differences and sensitivities."
Paris protests the massacre of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists by Muslims
On Wednesday, Islamic terrorists murdered 12 people at the leftist French satire magazine Charlie Hebdo, including the editor-in-chief and three cartoonists.
The motivation was clear: the terrorists shouted “Allahu Akhbar!” during the attack and screamed “We have avenged the prophet!” as they left the scene.
The true rationale for the attack is obvious: for years, Western politicians and media have cowered in the face of Islamic assaults on the exercise of free speech. The hallmark of Western civilization is freedom of the speech and of the press. The threats against, attacks on, and killings of journalists and satirists who attack Islam, combined with the despicable multicultural cowardice of the West, have destroyed freedom of speech and of the press.
The latest example of such cowardice comes in the words of President Obama. President Obama released a 145-word statement that contained neither the terms “freedom of speech” or “freedom of the press.” To her credit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel spoke truth where Obama would not: “This abominable act is not only an attack on the lives of French citizens and their security. It is also an attack on freedom of speech and the press, core elements of our free democratic culture. In no way can this be justified.”
Meanwhile, the media still refuse to show the cartoons of Mohammed published by Charlie Hebdo that apparently provided the original fodder for the attack.
Here are the top ten recent examples of top politicians and media figures providing justification for jihadi killing of those who slander the prophet of Islam.
President Barack Obama, 2012: On September 11, 2012, Islamic terrorists attacked the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, murdering four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. President Obama and his administration promptly blamed a filmmaker who made the YouTube film “The Innocence of Muslims.” He then went to United Nations on September 25, 2012, and said:
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.
Hillary Clinton, then-Secretary of State, also told Charles Woods, father of Ty Woods, one of the murdered men, that the American government would arrest the YouTube filmmaker.
As the world commemorates the 70th anniversary of D-Day we must take a good look at how that victory has been squandered.
We are slowly surrendering our freedoms. Under the guise of the War on Terror - where the definition of terrorist now expands to cover even those who peacefully protest animal abuse - governments are increasing their control over citizens.
Veteran William Ness (Daily Mail - PA)
Political correctness has become the excuse to not only stifle free speech, but to cover up actual events, lest their exposure might offend a particular group.
We don't fight evil anymore. We invite it to reside in our cities. Old England, with its Magna Carta pedigree, is now submitting to Sharia law imported from Saudi Arabia, one of the most repressive countries in the world.
The following articles speak eloquently of how far we have deviated since the greatest generation fought the dark genocidal force of Nazism and their allies and collaborators.
These days the "Free World" supports the Palestinians, who were allies of Hitler in the destruction of 6 million Jews and countless other victims. During World War II the Palestinian leader, the Mufti of Jerusalem, lived in Berlin. He held meetings with Hitler and his cohorts, and worked along with them in the design and implementation of the Holocaust. He also created a Nazi SS-Muslim division guilty of gruesome crimes in Eastern Europe. After the war he indoctrinated a new generation of Arab Nazis, such as Yassir Arafat and the current president of the Paletinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas. Palestinian collaboration with Hitler and the Holocaust http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2013/12/palestinian-collaboration-with-hitler.html
Not only supports, but actually finances the new Nazis, the Arab terrorists who murder Jewish men, women and children, and who eulogize Hitler and Nazism.
Photo on the right is of Palestinian Authority militia making the Nazi salute.
Payments will continue now that the PA Authority has allied itself with Hamas. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The British fought for freedom and traditional British values - but todayBritain is on its way to become a Muslim state. It is already Sharia-law compliant.
June 2014 - Daily Mail exposes first British secret trial for terror
A trial is to be held entirely in secret for the first time in British history. Two men accused of a terror plot will go into the dock at the Old Bailey in weeks. For undisclosed reasons of national security their identities, as well as details of their alleged crimes, will not be heard in public. The very existence of the trial can be disclosed today only because the Daily Mail fought with other media groups to have the reporting restrictions lifted.
