~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- The following article by media analyst Sean Durns highlights just some of the most egregious failures by the western media in the 1930s to expose the true nature of Nazism.
- They engaged in all sorts of mental contortions to excuse and even support Nazism.
- Hitler was, after all, an enemy of Communism, a powerful reason to go easy on Nazism.
- That media tolerance and support was sustained in spite of Hitler's very clear record of racism, and his book Mein Kampf's stated goals of world conquest and genocide.
- Today the political equivalent of Mein Kampf is the Koran.
- The Koran and the Hadith, the most sacred Muslim texts, clearly state Islam's goal of global conquest, the Allah-mandated murder of Infidels, and a political system that calls for sharia law and gruesome punishments for those who offend Allah.
VIDEO - THE NAZI ROOTS OF
THE PALESTINIAN MOVEMENT
- Incidentally, the words Jihad and Kampf both mean "struggle".
- The parallels between western media's tolerance and even defense of Hitler in the 1930s, and of Islam in the 21st century are absolutely stunning.
- And the parallels between Nazism and Islam are downright chilling.
- It's relevant to see the daily efforts by the western media to absolve Islam of any connection between repeated acts of jihad and its motivating ideology, Islam.
- Journalists, and political leaders as well, go out of their way to find excuses for those acts of carnage.
- In an act of willful blindness they refuse to even take a look at the Koran and Hadith with their clear mandates for violent jihad against the Infidel, or to read about the fourteen centuries of Muslim bloody conquests in Asia and Africa.
- Media pundits are quick to label Trump and his supporters as "Nazis" but they say absolutely nothing about the inherent anti-Semitic nature of Islam.
The Fuhrer and the Fourth State
By Sean Durns
Research Analyst at CAMERA
(Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America)
“There can be no higher law in journalism than to tell the truth, and to shame the devil,” U.S. commentator Walter Lippman once said. How then, did the U.S. media cover a man responsible for some of the most evil and heinous acts in recorded history: Adolf Hitler?
Press coverage of the German dictator defies a simple and neat summary, as the U.S. media was not, and has never been, a monolithic entity and coverage of Hitler naturally changed over time. Nonetheless, some patterns can be discerned from a cursory glance at the early years of Nazi rule.
Upon Hitler’s ascension to power in 1933, some U.S. news outlets did not see a devil, but rather, much needed stability being brought to a country that had been in economic and social upheaval since before the Great War.
Hitler and the Nazis were providing a “dark land a clear light of hope,” according to a 1933 dispatch by the Christian Science Monitor that was cited by the American historian Dr. Rafael Medoff (“The American Papers That Praised Hitler,” The Daily Beast, Dec. 20, 2015). CSM praised, at its outset, Nazi rule for bringing order; quite literally for making the trains arrive “punctually.”
Continue reading this article and see others on current media malpractice in their reporting on Islam
