~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ISIS - a geographically and ideologically expanding Muslim terrorist army - has been wrecking havoc for years, and yet the mightiest military power in the world, the USA, has been hesitant to wipe it out. Why?
There is much the US could have done to weaken them into insignificance, but it has chosen not to. The world looks on with astonishment as until recently 75% of US planes came back from bombing runs into ISIS-controlled territory without dropping a single bomb.
And when American pilots do bomb ISIS these days - shamed by Russia - the White House makes sure ISIS receives leaflets with advance notice so that no ISIS fighter (called 'civilians' by the White House) is injured.
 |
| Hezbullah missile |
Incidentally, Putin is no hero in fighting ISIS. His main interest is to carve out a Middle East area of influence for Russia by preserving the rule of Syria's president Assad.
Putin's actions will ensure the further empowerment of Assad's two other allies: Iran and Hezbullah.
Neither Iran nor Hezbullah are friendly to the West. Iran with its nuclear bombs in the making, often calls for death to America, and threatens Israel with complete annihilation. And the Lebanon-based Shiite terror army Hezbullah has 150,000 rockets aimed at Israel alone.
 |
| Muslim Nazi Hezbullah army - President Assad's ally |
There are no good guys in this conflict.
ISIS and assorted Jihadists on one side, and Hezbullah and Iran on the other. All of them with genocidal intentions against the West and Israel.
There are no perfect solutions either. As long as there is Islam there will be war between Shia and Sunni Muslims (each thinks the other is illegitimate), and between Muslims and everyone else - because the Koran and Hadith mandate good Muslims to conquer the world by jihad and slaughter the Infidel.
What Russia is getting out of meddling into this conflict is a temporary role of influence in the Middle East. Just temporary. The ME is always in flux. All western powers who thought they were manipulating Muslims for their own advantage have been proved wrong, and their efforts have invariably backfired.
Western political elites' insane manipulative schemes can be best illustrated by the fact that the White House still pursues the handing over of the Israeli Golan Heights to Syria.
This area that was liberated from Syria by Israel in the defensive war of 1967 would - according to US and EU policies - be better off in the hands of assorted Jihadi groups that dominate Syria, than under Israel's sovereignty.
The Israeli Golan is an island of peace and civilization for Jews and Arabs living there, while acts of war and terror explode every single day across the border with Syria.
Golan is the area in blue on the map. The grey diagonal lines are an area of separation. If Muslims were to control the Israeli Golan, they could have extraordinarily easy access to Israel by land and by water (Sea of Galilee). A Muslim Golan is what the White House envisions if it can bully Israel into surrendering it.
As you read the following analysis by Prof. Gil-White, please keep in mind the wider context: how the political elites in the European Union and in the White House are facilitating the empowering of Islam in the West (under the cover of tolerance and multiculturalism), AND the Muslim invasion of the West (under the cover of compassion for "refugees").
JUST WHERE DID ISIS COME FROM?
Historical and Investigative Research
(research assistance:
(research assistance:
Ricardo Sánchez Ambrosi & Arnulfo Quintero)
ISIS attacks Paris, all eyes on ISIS: a gang of terrorists that lord a chunk of the Middle East and claim to be ‘a State.’ Out of nowhere they came, it seems. But any hat trick needs misdirection — the magician’s trade. Now you see it, now you don’t. Case in point: strike terror in Paris, capture the attention, erase history.
ISIS was US policy. It was brewing since 2003, when the US invaded Iraq and ‘gifted’ Iraqis with jihadist terrorism that set the US-military prison system to overflowing, becoming a “jihadi university,” as the general in charge called it.
ISIS was US policy. It was brewing since 2003, when the US invaded Iraq and ‘gifted’ Iraqis with jihadist terrorism that set the US-military prison system to overflowing, becoming a “jihadi university,” as the general in charge called it.
When “jihadi university” graduates produced ISIS, and ISIS produced the Syrian Civil War, the US helped them again.
Pay attention, or you won’t see the next trick coming. After ISIS claimed responsibility for a massive terror attack in Paris, Margot Wallstrom, on Swedish television, explained the radicalization of European Muslims thus: “Palestinians see that there isn’t a future.”[1]
A conditioned response, as old as the West. Something bad happened? Blame a Jew. And don’t you worry about making sense. Wallstrom can do better. It is her job to do better: she is the Swedish foreign minister. If she would only deputize someone from her staff to do a few hours research she would find—in the publicly available sources—the real cause of ISIS and its violence. (But perhaps she’s done that already…)
How the US created ISIS
I shall here briefly summarize what a few hours of research taught me:
Continue reading, including updates including Congressional Benghazi commission results pointing to the White House secret gun-running operation in Libya - all to ISIS benefit.
