GENOCIDE COVERUP - HOW THE DEMOCRAT WHITE HOUSE ALLOWED 800,000 TUTSIS TO BE SLAUGHTERED IN 1994 - and then covered up their political reasons for their inaction - Some of those involved in the abandoment and the coverup are still active in US politics

By Thane Rosenbaum and Rafael Medoff - Jerusalem Post

 

NEWLY RELEASED CABLES TELL THE TRUTH

Twenty years ago this week, machete-wielding militias of the Hutu tribe in Rwanda were carrying out nationwide massacres of members of the country’s ethnic minority, the Tutsis.   Detailed information about the genocide began reaching the West almost as soon as it started.

This has always been an uncomfortable truth for those in the Clinton administration who were responsible for matters of state, global affairs and human rights.

 

To his great credit, president Bill Clinton has acknowledged that America’s silence during the genocide in Rwanda was one of the failures of his presidency.

 Others in his administration, however, have been neither as honorable nor as forthcoming. 

Newly released cables about the 1994 genocide flatly contradict previous accounts by some of those officials.

 

Refusal of the Obama White House to declassify additional documents hasn’t helped clear up this moral morass. The fact that some of the Clinton-era figures involved in this episode now work in the Obama administration adds yet another troubling layer to this unfolding story.

Evidence was available within three days.

 

Three days after the mass killings started, front page newspaper articles cited Red Cross eyewitnesses who reported that “tens of thousands” had already been murdered, with corpses piled “in the houses, in the streets, everywhere.” Separately, the Clinton White House was receiving detailed intelligence about the murders from its diplomats and other sources on the scene.

Political expedience trumps the need to protect victims

 

Yet, as Samantha Power reported in her book, A Problem from Hell, a Defense Department memo revealed that the State Department was “worried” that acknowledging the genocide “could commit [the US] to actually ‘do something.’”

 

 

Susan Rice, then director of Africa Affairs for the National Security Council, asked her colleagues: “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November [congressional] elections?” 

 

Rice’s remark briefly attracted public attention in 2012 when she was nominated by President Barack Obama to serve as his national security adviser. When asked, she claimed not to recall having made this statement, and then added that had she done so it would have been “inappropriate.”

Try “appalling.” And the convenient memory lapse sounds unconvincing.
 

Newly released cables between the US and other governments

The new release of some 300 cables between the US and other governments as the genocide raged raises new questions about the response of senior American officials. The cables concern the United Nations peacekeeping force stationed in Rwanda.

After 10 members of the force were murdered, some of the participating nations wanted to cut and run – even though that meant leaving the Tutsis without any protection and granting the Hutus a green light to hack the Tutsis to death.

Then secretary of state Madeline Albright:  abandon the Tutsis and get the peacekeepers out

 

Former secretary of state Madeline Albright, who was America’s ambassador to the United Nations at the time, was a pivotal figure in these discussions. Later, in her autobiography and in media interviews, Albright blamed the State Department and the National Security Council for urging withdrawal of UN forces. But the newly released cables tell a very different version of events.

On April 12, 1994, ambassador Albright sent a cable to the State Department urging that the US take the lead in advocating a withdrawal of all the peacekeepers except for “a skeletal staff.” Albright wasn’t thinking about rescue; she was identifying a “window of opportunity” for UN forces to escape through an airport still under Belgian and French control.

Secretary of state Warren Christopher, heeding Albright’s advice, threw his support behind the withdrawal proposal and the UN Security Council voted to pull out all but 273 of the peacekeepers.

Over the next three months, in full view of an indifferent international community, Hutu death squads slaughtered 800,000 Tutsis.

The abandonment story now becomes one of US government coverup 

 

This is not, however, just another sad story about the abandonment of a far-away people in a distant land. With the release of these cables, this is now the story of a cover-up involving prominent government figures – one, in fact, who holds a senior position in the Obama administration.

Albright, although retired from government, remains an influential elder stateswoman of diplomatic affairs and is said to serve as an unofficial foreign policy adviser to Hillary Clinton.

 

Incredibly, Albright was chosen to co-chair a Genocide Prevention Task Force in 2007.

 

Susan Rice's ongoing credibility problem

 

Of even greater concern is the role of Rice, who is now chief national security adviser to the president.

At the time of the genocide, Rice worked directly under Richard A. Clarke, the National Security Council official who argued most vehemently for the US to stay out of Rwanda and to withdraw the UN forces.

 

But aside from her unfortunate statement in which she drew a moral equivalence between saving Rwandan lives and winning congressional elections, what else did she know and say?

 

Rice has in the past year served as a lightning rod for criticism over her statements concerning the 2012 attack on the US embassy in Benghazi, Libya.

 

And more recently she described returned prisoner of war Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who apparently deserted his post, as having served with “honor and distinction.”

The Obama administration may have good reason not to declassify internal White House e-mails from 1994 regarding America’s response to the genocide in Rwanda: when Rice speaks, her employers often end up looking foolish.

Moral failure in the face of genocide is surely not new. The path to every genocide, it seems, is paved by the inaction of government officials with their self-serving rationales for not rescuing those who could otherwise be saved. It is no consolation that these recent disclosures about America’s failure to intervene in Rwanda place it in the derelict company of other nations that likewise stood by. Yes, it’s a sad story, but worst of all – it’s an old one.

Thane Rosenbaum, a novelist and law professor at New York University, teaches human rights and has written widely on Holocaust-related themes.
Dr. Rafael Medoff is a historian and founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies.            

Link to this article
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Another-cover-up-of-genocide-360570

Photo - http://www.rwandanstories.org/genocide/roadblocks.html

RELATED

PBS Frontline - How the West turned its back on the victims
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/evil/

Rwanda Genocide - 100 Days of Slaughter
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-26875506

Wikipedia  -  The Rwandan Genocide
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_Genocide

Rwanda genocide scholars urge Jews to recognize Iran's threat as similar to that of the Nazis

“When leaders of the Iranian regime and other Islamist social movements repeatedly call for the annihilation of the Jewish people and the State of Israel, which is actually consistent with their warped ideology, then the response must be unequivocal and strong,” a scholar said.

http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/04/01/rwandan-genocide-scholars-urge-jews-to-recognize-iran-threat-as-similar-to-nazi-regime-interview/

Some other 20th century major genocides

Armenians in Turkey - 1915 to 1918 - 1.5 million deaths
Stalin forced famine - 1932 to 1933 - 7 million deaths
Rape of Nanking - 1937 to 1938 - 300,000 deaths
Nazi Holocaust - 1938 to 1945 - 6 million deaths
Pol Pot in Cambodia - 1975 to 1979 - 2 million deaths

The list is much longer - Read more here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides_by_death_toll

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

GENOCIDE IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW

Africa and the Middle East in particular are still being ravaged by genocide perpetrated in the name of religion. 

 

In Africa both Muslims and Christians kill each other, but the ferocity and sheer number of Muslim attacks on Christians are shocking.

 

The Middle East continues to be in upheaval with over a million of refugees fleeing persecution and murder, and a still unknown number of murdered victims.

 

In Syria and Iraq the Shiite and Sunni Muslim factions are slaughtering each other, and both often kill Christians they find in the way.

 

But judging by the United Nations reaction and that of the superpowers, aside from a lot of talk and commiseration, in the end it's all business as usual.

 

************************************************************