~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you look at many of the current abuses perpetrated by human rights movements, you'll remember that they started out as well-intentioned and rather minor legislation to protect the vulnerable.
Example 1: the pro-homosexual movement started out to prevent discrimination in housing and in jobs. It moved on rapidly to demand gay marriage, and now the normalization, teaching, and promotion of homosexual behaviour and transgenderism in schools - under the guise of sexual education.
The victims have become the victimizers by jeopardizing the mental health and future of millions of children as young as 6 years old, who are indoctrinated with ideas about sex and depraviy that their young minds cannot process correctly.
If you raise your voice in protest, you are accused of being homophobic, and maybe a hate criminal as well. In Ontario, Canada, the government can take your child away if you object to your six year old identifying with the opposite sex.
Example2: The left promotes unfettered mass migration from the third world into the west, and whoever objects to it is called a racist and a Nazi. The UK Labour government of Tony Blair promised that migration from third world countries would be minimal. He predicted just 15,000 a year, but within two years some 600,000 were in the country. Today there are millions, with at least 35,000 of them identified by police as dangerous jihadis. The equivalent of a whole new town of migrants is added to Britain each week. 
Example 3 - Protecting minorities? Any dissent against EU immigration policy or denunciation of Islam's beliefs that contradict western values is of course denounced as racist, and the individual may be charged with a hate crime. UK politician Nigel Farage was arrested and charged with a hate crime a couple of years ago for quoting Winston Churchill's book The River War, because the former PM's views on Islam are regarded as politically incorrect by today's standards. European Union countries have been the most radical in passing laws and regulations selectively muzzling freedom of speech, particularly when it criticizes Islam. (Imams preach genocidal hatred from mosques, but that is tolerated.) EU authorities not only ban what the government and the left defines as hate speech. Publishing some historical photos, for example, can also land you in jail because they may show Islam in an unfavorable light. Here is a recent example, out of many similar ones that protect Islam (but not Christianity).
To jail for posting historical photo:
German citizen Michael Stürzenberger was arrested and then sentenced to six months in prison for posting a photo of the Palestinian Haj Amin Al Husseini with Adolf Hitler.
In fact, it is no secret that Hitler and the Mufti worked together on expediting the Final Solution to include all Jews living in the Middle East.
This Nazi-Palestinian alliance and collaboration was so strong that the Mufti himself headed a Nazi SS Division of mostly Bosnian Muslims, later on charged with perpetrating gruesome mass killings in Eastern Europe.
Photos of the Palestinian Mufti of Jerusalem with Hitler and his cohorts have been around for decades, but are avoided by media sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. Until only recently even Israeli politicians avoided delving into the subject of Nazi-Palestinian alliance, until PM Netanyahu finally said it out loud on a speech that caused dismay on the left. The obvious question is how can the PM be in favor of portioning Israel to create a terror state for Arab Nazi collaborators? Germany had to pay reparations, but the Palestinians feel entitled to the gift of a country of their own on ancient biblical Jewish land.
The war on freedom of speech comes to America, with help from Trump
Americans are already subjected to restrictions on what they publish on social media, since the monopolies of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube can censor not only what they consider offensive, but they can also censor mainstream conservative views.
Americans are still proud of their First Amendment, knowing that freedom of speech is protected, and that any abuses can be dealt with by using laws concerning libel, obscenity, etc. What they are slowly realizing is that they are being betrayed by politicians conspiring to restrict freedom of speech to ever higher levels, all in the name of tolerance.
Americans are still proud of their First Amendment, knowing that freedom of speech is protected, and that any abuses can be dealt with by using laws concerning libel, obscenity, etc. What they are slowly realizing is that they are being betrayed by politicians conspiring to restrict freedom of speech to ever higher levels, all in the name of tolerance.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Breitbart just published the following commentary with great alarm:
TRUMP Signs ‘Anti-Hate’ Resolution, a Major Assault on America’s First Amendment
By Raheem Kassam, Editor in Chief of Breitbart London, and author of
According to the Associated Press reports President Donald Trump has signed a resolution condemning white supremacists, neo-Nazis and other hate groups following a white-nationalist rally in Virginia that descended into deadly violence. The resolution also urged Trump and his administration to speak out against hate groups that espouse racism, anti-Semitism and white supremacy.
That’s not entirely accurate. In fact it’s a pretty thoughtless and likely intentional misinterpretation of the breadth of this resolution and its real world implications. The resolution expresses “support for the Charlottesville community”, which is great, but then demands the President rejects “White nationalists, White supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups” and urges him and his cabinet to “use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups”.
Were it simply this symbolic, I wouldn’t be banging on about it. Were epithets like “white nationalist” or “white supremacist” not used against people like me, and sites like Breitbart.com, it may be excusable — and mockable — as simple virtue signaling.
But it’s not just symbolic. The resolution demands “the President and the President’s Cabinet… use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups” and requires “the heads of other Federal agencies… improve the reporting of hate crimes and… emphasize the importance of the collection, and… reporting to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, of hate crime data by State and local agencies”.
Continue reading this article, see references, and related items
As egregious and disgusting as many of the groups mentioned are, this is still — last time I checked — the United States of America. The only country that has enshrined in law its commitment to defending people’s rights to say whatever they want, no matter how nasty, depraved, absurd, or “deplorable”.
It is also telling that after months of hurling these labels at people like you and I — and indeed at the President himself — the establishment is now demanding President Trump “use all available resources to address the threats”.
This isn’t just an attack on the KKK and fringe groups. It’s a veiled attack on anything the establishment considers to be a threat to its long-standing though swiftly diminishing hegemony over the political discourse in this country. If you’re on the political left — especially if you’re a Bernie supporter — don’t think they won’t try and apply this to you, too. This is real fascism.
As I said recently of the intentionally vague and sometimes meaningless terminology used in the resolution::
Today, a “racist” is someone who believes in legal immigration. An “extremist” is someone who doesn’t believe in mass, state-funded abortion. A “xenophobe” is someone who takes pride in their nation. An “anti-Semite” is — curiously — someone who supports the State of Israel, and “white supremacy” now occupies the Oval Office. The Overton window has shifted so far that even practicing Muslims are now decried by the most heavily quoted sources as “Islamophobes”.
(NOTE - The very pro-Israel Breitbart News, Steve Bannon, and an assortment of black, gay, and Jewish pro-Trump activists have been falsely and absurdly accused by the left and mainstream media of being white supremacists and anti-Semites. - Blogger)
Last night the President signed this.
While I have no truck with ethno-nationalists or the KKK, this is an obvious ruse — the first move in a long attempt to criminalise speech, or even thought, in the United States.
Ask yourself why when there are hurricanes, when there’s North Korea, when there’s international terrorism, when there’s the DACA debate, the President was being urged to sign this resolution right now.
Why the priority if its only symbolic? Why the loose language? This is a heinous betrayal, and the fact no one seems to care about it is even more concerning.
By Raheem Kassam is the Editor in Chief of Breitbart London and author of No Go Zones: How Shariah Law is Coming to a Neighborhood Near You√
Source
REFERENCES AND RELATED ITEMS
New Ontario (Canada) Law Enables Gov’t to Seize Children from Parents Opposing Gender Transition
The Canadian government may legally remove children from families that refuse to accept their child’s chosen “gender identity” thanks to new legislation passed by the Ontario province. Bill 89, “Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017,” was approved on June 1 by a vote of 63 to 23. The Minister of Children and Youth Services, Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said earlier this year that a parent’s failure to recognize and support a child’s gender self-identification is a form of child abuse, and a child in these circumstances should be removed from the situation and placed into protection.
Canadian child protection services are no stranger to invasive micromanagement of child-rearing according to a predetermined worldview. In April of this year, a Christian couple filed a lawsuit against Hamilton Children’s Aid Society after two foster children were removed from their care because they refused tell the children that the Easter bunny is real.
Read more
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/10/report-uk-population-gains-equivalent-new-town-every-week/
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/09/security-chief-says-uk-is-home-to-35000-islamic-jihadis
Tony Blair worried anti-immigration feeling is leading to Brexit - Calls for more controls over immigration, after having opened the floodgates himself.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/10/blair-immigration-controls-stop-brexit/
Nigel Farage arrested for quoting Churchill on Islam
Accused of religious and racial harassment for simply reading Churchill's book aloud.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614834/Arrested-quoting-Winston-Churchill-European-election-candidate-accused-religious-racial-harassment-repeats-wartime-prime-ministers-words-Islam-campaign-speech.html
GERMAN SENTENCED TO JAIL FOR PUBLISHING HISTORICAL PHOTO
I'm personally not familiar with the activist mentioned below, but I am with the photo for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.
It shows the Palestinian leader, the Mufti of Jerusalem, meeting a top Nazi official. This Mufti also met with Adolf Hitler. They discussed how to expedite the extermination of the Jews, and how to also include Middle Eastern in this genocide.
Subsequently the Mufti of Jerusalem remained in Berlin for the rest of the war, working closely with Hitler's henchmen and supervising an Nazi SS Division of Bosnian Muslims that perpetrated crimes against humanity in Eastern Europe.
Michael Stürzenberger: Six Months in Prison for Posting a Photo of Hitler and the Mufti on Facebook
Michael Stürzenberger is a stalwart Islam-critic who campaigned tirelessly against the proposed mega-mosque in Munich. He is also well-known for work on behalf of Die Freiheit and his writings at Politically Incorrect.
Mr. Stürzenberger was sentenced to six months in prison for posting a photo of Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem on his Facebook page.
This was not a photoshop job, mind you. The picture was not digitally altered. It was a simple historical artifact from World War Two.
Six months in the slammer for that.
The following report by Egri Nök was posted earlier today at Vlad Tepes
GERMANY – A district court in Munich earlier today sentenced the German journalist Michael Stürzenberger to six months in jail and an additional 100 hours of charitable work for publishing this photo in his Facebook timeline.
It shows Adolf Hitler and Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, shaking hands in 1941 in Berlin.
Along with the photo, he had written a review of an article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, ‘Hakenkreuz und Halbmond’ (“Swastika and Crescent Moon”) about the National Socialists’ admiration for Islam, and mentioned his own review [of that Süddeutsche article in PI-News].
For this post, in particular the photo, the court found Stürzenberger guilty of “disseminating the propaganda of anti-constitutional organizations”.
The prosecution had accused Stürzenberger of “inciting hatred towards Islam” and “denigrating Islam” by publishing the photo. A superficial onlooker, the prosecution argued, could not know that this black and white photo in Stürzenberger’s timeline was a historical document.
According to PI-News, the sentence might be handed down as a suspended sentence for three and a half years.
Thank you Ava Lon for translating Stürzenberger’s original FB post:
The realization that Islam is a fascist ideology was made presentable two years ago by the Egyptian political scientist Hamed Abdel-Samad with his book Islamic Fascism. Even though this was already clear to former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (“The Koran is the Mein Kampf of the Prophet Mohammed”), but political correctness has long prevented this fact from being openly stated. The Bavarian interior minister Joachim Herrmann has now also jumped on that train and compares Mein Kampf with the warlike announcements of the Islamic state that can be read on the Internet. From there to the Koran is only a small step, which he doesn’t dare yet take. The Süddeutsche Zeitung describes the Nazi pact with Islam and also quotes important statements by Himmler and Hitler. More information at Politically Incorrect.
SOURCES
https://vladtepesblog.com/2017/08/18/interview-with-michael-sturzenberger-on-his-6-month-jail-sentence-for-posting-historical-fact/
Germany: Michael Stürzenberger’s bank terminates his account because of his criticism of Islam
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/12/22/germany-michael-sturzenbergers-bank-terminates-his-account-because-of-his-criticism-of-islam/
Germany: Michael Stürzenberger’s bank terminates his account because of his criticism of Islam
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/12/22/germany-michael-sturzenbergers-bank-terminates-his-account-because-of-his-criticism-of-islam/
VIDEO - Interview with Michael Stürzenberger on his 6 month jail sentence for posting historical fact
VIDEO - THE NAZI ROOTS OF THE PALESTINIAN MOVEMENT
PAT CONDELL VIDEO
A SPECIAL KIND OF HATE
ANCIENT MUSLIM HATE FOR JEWS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQjTLGgQV2w&feature=player_embedded
ISRAELI PM NETANYAHU FINALLY DENOUNCES PALESTINIAN COLLABORATION WITH HITLER AND THE HOLOCAUST, prompting attacks by the pro-Arab left
--- So why is the PM willing to cede Jewish land to Muslim Nazis?
--- And why did it take so long for the government to denounce these historical facts?
--- The Nazi ideology of anti-Semitism and genocide is popular and part of the Palestinian movement TODAY
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2015/10/israeli-pm-netanyahu-denounces.html
ISRAELI PM NETANYAHU FINALLY DENOUNCES PALESTINIAN COLLABORATION WITH HITLER AND THE HOLOCAUST, prompting attacks by the pro-Arab left --- So why is the PM willing to cede Jewish land to Muslim Nazis?
--- And why did it take so long for the government to denounce these historical facts?
--- The Nazi ideology of anti-Semitism and genocide is popular and part of the Palestinian movement TODAY
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2015/10/israeli-pm-netanyahu-denounces.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments are always appreciated, but please do not include links.