A universe of beauty, mystery and wonder

A universe of beauty, mystery and wonder

Saturday, April 22, 2017

HOAX ON HUFFINGTON POST EXPOSES THE LEFT'S ULTIMATE PLAN TO DISEMPOWER WHITE AMERICANS - The black on white violence in the USA, and the anti-white genocide in South Africa, all completely ignored by the media

© Unauthorized duplication of this blog's material is prohibited.   Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full credit and link is given to Otters and Science News Blogspot.  Link to this post: - Thank you for visiting my blog.
Disclaimer:  Your blogger is not a 'white male' but a female with an olive complexion, and with family roots in the Mediterranean.
  • For years there has been an ongoing black-on-white campaign of violent assaults in the USA - fully ignored by the mainstream media because it does not fit their narrative of black victimization.
  • Now the verbal war on whites is ramping up on mainstream media. 
  • Calls for the murder of  whites are found "not to violate ethical standards" at sites such as Facebook and Twitter.   Anti-white incitement and hate are becoming increasingly acceptable.
  • There is a disturbing political alliance of the left, Islam, black nationalism, and radical feminism - all of which have one goal in common: the undermining and eventual dismantlement of western society and values.
  • The rationale seems to be that if in spite of all efforts at forced diversity, affirmative action, and other policies that ignore personal merit, non-whites are still trailing, then whites, men, and overachieving groups such as Jews and Chinese must be forcibly removed from the playing field.
  • Anti-white discrimination is applied from the very top with mandatory affirmative action for non-white admissions to colleges and the workplace.
  • While mere criticism of Obama is still condemned as "racist," now it is acceptable to call for the murder of president Trump, and even the murder of whites for being white. 
  • While the left characterizes Trump supporters as "Nazis" - it is the leftist rhetoric that increasingly reflects Nazi ideology  - with the perpetrators being leftists and non-whites.
  • Anti-white rhetoric is ramping up on campuses across the nation.
  • Colleges are now places where whiteness is regarded as an ingrained flaw.  White students are asked to apologize for their color and the history of their race.
  • The war against whites is particularly vicious when it targets white males.  Masculinity is now characterized as "toxic" - and another ingrained flaw for which white male college students are expected to apologize.
  • The following story of a hoax perpetrated on the liberal Huffington Post painfully illustrates the degree to which American society is fragmenting along race and gender lines.
  • It also exposes the alarming extremes in anti-white racism and anti-straight-male bias which are now becoming acceptable in schools and media.
  • When a man posing as a South African radical feminist submitted an article demanding an end to white male voting right (or at least a 20 year moratorium) , the Huffington Post deemed such article and its racist premise to be worthy of publication.  Not only that, but facing criticism, its editor strongly defended the article. 
  • The column was eventually found to have been a hoax, and its author ended up losing his job.  The Huffington Post's editor apparently kept hers.  
If whites are to blame for everything, how come African countries have so much racism, inequality, poverty, tribal violence, genocide and corruption, in spite of billions of dollars in aid over many decades now?
VIDEO -Time to condemn racist "Black Nationalism" By Jay Fayza, Rebel Media
According to the FBI, 24.3 percent of people who committed hate crimes were Black. Considering that Blacks are just 13 per cent of the US population, that is a wildly disproportionate number.  Black nationalism, especially in the form of anti-white propaganda and violence, is a serious problem in America.  It’s just as much of a problem as white nationalism can be, if not more, since it’s widely accepted in our culture to be racist against whites.

More videos by Jay Fayza

The Left's Ultimate Plan Revealed

For a distillation of the contemporary left’s worldview, one needn’t look any further than a blog post that was recently published at the Huffington Post:
“Could it Be Time to Deny White Men the Franchise?”   At least one could have turned to this post—until HuffPo took it down.  But we’ll get to that shortly.
The author, a person going by the name of “Shelley Garland,” a self-declared South African and graduate student in philosophy, argued that it is morally necessary to temporarily deny the franchise to white men.   Moreover, at least some of their resources should be repossessed and “redistributed” to others. 

Garland explains her reasons.  First, white men are bad for left-wing progressivism.  “Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year,” she writes, “have often been due to the votes of white men.”  She gives examples.  

“If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.”  “If white men no longer had the vote,” Garland summarily states, “the progressive cause would be strengthened.” 
She’s quick to underscore that she is proposing nothing more than “the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation),” for this is all that it would take to “go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world.”

Continue reading, including UPDATE (Huffingon Post editor forced to resign over charges of racism)


Garland explains that “liberalism—and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism—are the most popular ideologies among white males” because, “with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation,” they “allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.”
Denying white men the vote, even if temporarily, would “strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.”
Another reason why white men need to be constrained is compensatory in nature.  The disenfranchisement of white men, Garland eagerly wishes, “could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners.  After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. 
A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.  The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.”
While admitting that it may indeed be “unfair” to adopt the measures that she urges, Garland insists that “this violent status quo will not change without a struggle, and the only way to do so will be through the expropriation of these various assets and equitably distribute them to those who need them.” 
Going this route “will not only make the world a more equitable place, but will also go some way to paying the debt that white males owe the world.”  For “500 years,” such evils as “colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men.”   

Thus: “Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.”
The unfairness to white males “is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black and female-identifying bodies.”
Garland reiterates her call: “It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males[.]”
The backlash on social media was immediate and relentless.  Initially, the editor-in-chief of HuffPo SA, Verashni Pillay, stridently defended the post. 
Garland’s “underlying analysis about the uneven distribution of wealth and power in the world,” Pillay remarked, “is pretty standard for feminist theory.”
Moreover, it has “been espoused in many different ways by feminist writers and theorists for decades now.  In that sense, there was nothing in the article that should have shocked or surprised anyone (or so we thought).”
Pillay accuses critics of refusing to engage Garland’s blog post and informs them that there is no way to avoid her conclusion given her premises, premises that she and her ilk at the Huffington Post share with Garland. 
“Dismantling the patriarchal systems that have brought us to where we are today, a world where power is wielded to dangerous and destructive ends by men, and in particular white men, necessarily means a loss of power to those who hold it.”
Pillay doesn’t mince words: “Those who have held undue power granted to them by the patriarchy must lose it for us to be truly equal.  This seems blindingly obvious to us all.”  
Then, however, something happened.
Huffington Post SA removed the post, supposedly because “the blog submission from an individual who called herself Shelley Garland, who claimed to be an MA student at UCT, cannot be traced and appears not to exist.” It then reaffirmed “the Constitutional values of South Africa,” especially “universal enfranchisement.”
The “Shelley Garland” post was a hoax.
A person, a female, claiming to be the author of the piece referred to it as “total garbage” that she packed with clichés—“black and female-identifying bodies,” “patriarchy,” etc.—that are common currency among the “less sensible left.”
“Shelley Garland” supplied to the nation an invaluable service.  In one little article, she revealed for all with eyes to see the gist to which the agenda of today’s left ultimately boils down:
It is resolutely, vehemently anti-white, specifically anti-white men.  
Leftists almost always hide behind abstractions and generalities.  They know that if they are too overt in expressing their plans for the rest of us, the latter would stall.  A real leftist wouldn’t want to state things as baldly as “Garland” did.  But as Pillay made abundantly clear before she and her employer had to go into damage control, “Garland’s” is the position of the hard left, and has been “for decades now.”
Thank you, “Shelley Garland,” for unveiling the truth.


More fascinating articles by Jack Kerwick on the current identity politics war on campus and elsewhere in American society



A South African man who, posing as a feminist activist, convinced the Huffington Post to publish an article calling for white males to have their voting rights removed has now lost his job after HuffPo editors tracked him down and confronted him at his workplace.

Last week, HuffPo published a piece entitled “Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?” written by supposed feminist activist “Shelley Garland.” 

Garland has now been revealed to be the pseudonym of Marius Roodt, a think-tank employee from Johannesberg, who created the persona in order to expose HuffPo’s racism and “lack of fact-checking.”
In the face of public outrage, the Huffington Post initially defended the piece. According to Verashni Pillay, editor-in-chief of HuffPo South Africa, “dismantling the patriarchal systems that have brought us to where we are today, a world where power is wielded to dangerous and destructive ends by men, and in particular white men, necessarily means a loss of power to those who hold it.”
Only after learning that “Shelley Garland” did not exist, and that they had been trolled, did the Huffington Post retract the article and affirm that they “fully support” universal enfranchisement.

In a later post, Verashni Pillay also apologized for initially defending the piece.”I did not make it clear enough in my initial response that I absolutely do not agree with the disenfranchisement of any group of people,” wrote Pillay. “I don’t hate white men.”
Following the humiliation, the Huffington Post decided that their hoaxer needed to be punished rather than praised for exposing the clear weaknesses of their editorial process (which HuffPo themselves admitted to, and pledged to improve, in the post announcing the retraction of “Garland’s” article.)
The man behind “Shelley Garland,” Marius Roodt, was identified after the Huffington Post digitally traced his email and used facial recognition technology on the picture of “Garland,” which was actually a picture of Roodt altered to look like a woman.

Armed with video recording equipment, three HuffPo editors then arrived at Roodt’s workplace to confront him.

Marius Roodt, as 'Shelley Garland', and as himself
Putting him on the spot in a video interview, the HuffPo editors then asked him a number of questions including, “Are you sorry for what you did?” HuffPo editor-at-large Ferial Haffajee also told Roodt that she thought his hoax had been an example of “his own anger coming out” and had been a “very angry thing to do.”
The HuffPo editors also drew attention to some of the consequences caused by the publication of the piece. Despite the fact that the Huffington Post made the decision to publish the article, they called on Roodt to answer for them.
“Did you think that this might – if this were published – might lead to racial discord, or might harden attitudes on both sides?” asked Pieter du Toit, deputy editor of HuffPo South Africa. “It’s led to a white Twitter outcry. It’s led to some terrible things being said about South Africans across the board, and terrible things being said personally about our colleagues [and] the title we work for.”
And yet, it was Roodt, not anyone at the Huffington Post, who ended up losing his job. Roodt tendered his resignation with his employer, the Centre for Development and Enterprise, a prestigious South African think-tank.
The resignation was accepted by Ann Bernstein, the CDE’s director. Roodt has yet to explain why he felt the need to resign, given that he appears to have done a service to South African journalism by exposing lax editorial standards and a troubling level of racism at a major online publication.



South African Press Ombudsman Condemns ‘Overt Racism’ Of Huffington Post, Causing Editor to Resign

Verashni Pillay, the editor-in-chief of Huffington Post South Africa has resigned after the country’s press ombudsman condemned the website’s “racist” publication of a blog post calling for voting rights to be stripped from white males.

In their ruling, the South African press ombudsman called on Huffington Post SA to “apologize unreservedly to the general public” for publishing text that was, according to the ombudsman, “discriminatory and derogatory,” “malicious,” “contained factual inaccuracies,” “was against the public interest,” “impaired the dignity and reputation of many people,” and “amounted to hate speech.”

The ombudsman is also calling on Huffington Post SA to apologize for “blaming its system, instead of probing deeper into the sexist and racist nature of the blog” in their response to the controversy.

Former editor-in-chief Pillay said: “I respect the office of the press ombudsman and have decided to tender my resignation.”

The controversy arose as a result of an article, published on the Huffington Post South Africa’s website on April 13, entitled “Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?”

The article made the case for stripping voting rights from white men, on the basis that white male voters were responsible for “some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year” including Brexit and the election of President Donald Trump.

After public backlash, Pillay initially defended the piece.

In a blog post on 14 April, Pillay wrote: “dismantling the patriarchal systems that have brought us to where we are today, a world where power is wielded to dangerous and destructive ends by men, and in particular white men, necessarily means a loss of power to those who hold it.”

It later emerged that the author of the piece, supposed feminist activist “Shelley Garland” was in fact the pseudonym of Marius Roodt, a male employee of a Johannesburg-based think-tank who submitted the piece to the Huffington Post in order to expose their lack of fact-checking and oversight.

Three editors of HuffPo South Africa tracked Roodt down to his workplace, where they publicly shamed him live on camera, with one editor accusing him of letting “his own anger com[e] out” through the piece, and asking him if he was “sorry” for what he did.

After being confronted, Roodt immediately resigned from his position at the think-tank, the Centre for Development and Enterprise.

The South African press ombudsman, however, appears to have upheld Roodt’s suspicions about the Huffington Post, specifically condemning their factual inaccuracies, as well as their racism and sexism.

After it emerged that the article was a hoax, Pillay backtracked on her original decision to defend it. “I did not make it clear enough in my initial response that I absolutely do not agree with the disenfranchisement of any group of people,” wrote Pillay. “I don’t hate white men.”

The complainant who brought the case to the ombudsman’s attention, Dr. Christopher McCreanor, said he did not accept the Huffinton Post’s attempt to pin the blame on Roodt. “What is concerning is that [Pillay] has allowed an extremely sexist and racist post to be published in the first place” said McCreanor.

In their ruling, the South African press ombudsman made it clear that Pillay was free to publish and defend anything she wished, but not within the confines of the South African press code, which the article violated.

Despite his services to South African journalism, Marius Roodt has yet to be reinstated in his former position at the Centre for Development and Enterprise.


- The media censors news that expose black racist violence against whites, Asians and Jews.
 - The media prefers to impose their narrative of blacks as victims instead of perpetrators
 - WATCH VIDEOS and read columns by author COLIN FLAHERTY on the epidemic of black racist violence in America



VIDEO - Conversation between author Colin Flaherty and Stefan Molyneux
Why Black Crime Matters

  • Colin Flaherty’s by-line and work has appeared in thousands of newspapers, magazines and electronic outlets all over the world, including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Fortune, NPR, Fox News and Bloomberg.
  • He is the author of the Amazon #1 Best Selling Book, White Girl Bleed a Lot:The return of racial violence and how the media ignore it.

Colin Flaherty - YouTube channel



Columns by Colin Flaherty

On American Thinker

On World Net Daily

White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It is a 2012 nonfiction book by Colin Flaherty regarding race and crime, particularly the knockout game, violent flash mobs, and the epidemic of black on white crime in the USA

Knockout Game a Lie?: Awww, Hell No! by [Flaherty, Colin]'Don't Make the Black Kids Angry': The hoax of black victimization and those who enable it.
Colin Flaherty's books at Amazon



- And if whites are to blame for everything, how come African countries have so much racism, inequality, poverty, tribal violence, genocide and corruption?

Some of the greatest genocides since the end of World War II have occurred in Africa.   Millions of black lives have been destroyed in gruesome and sadistic violence by fellow black Africans.

Two examples:  (1)  In 1966 between 30,000 and 50,000 Igbos were massacred by Hausa-Fulanis in Nigeria. (2)  In 1994 Hutus massacred at least ONE MILLION Tutsis. 



The Gruesome Reality of Black South Africa
In July of 2012, Dr. Gregory Stanton, head of the nonprofit group Genocide Watch, conducted a fact-finding mission in South Africa.   He concluded that there is a coordinated campaign of genocide being conducted against white farmers, known as Boers.
 “The farm murders, we have become convinced, are not accidental,” Stanton contended.  "It was very clear that the massacres were not common crimes," he added -- especially because of the absolute barbarity used against the victims.
"We don’t know exactly who is planning them yet, but what we are calling for is an international investigation,” he added.  The number of farm murders, or "plaasmoorde" as it is called in Afrikaans, is staggering.
Over the last decade, it is estimated that at least 3000 Boers (2012 figures) have been killed. Estimating the number of murders is necessary because the ANC has banned crime statistics from being compiled, claiming they scare off foreign investment.
Moreover, the world knows little about the savagery that accompanies those killings. Many victims, including women and infant children, are raped or tortured before they are killed.
Some have boiling water poured down their throats, some are burned with hot pokers, and some are hacked to death with machetes, or disemboweled. Several others have been tied to their own cars and dragged for miles.

Read more

British woman is killed and her husband left for dead after South African robbers torture them for hours with a blowtorch before shooting them and dumping them in a ditch 
  • Sue Howarth, 64, was killed and her husband Robert Lynn, 66, survived 
  • Couple were asleep at their farm in South Africa when three men broke in
  • Were attacked with a blowtorch at their remote home, 150 miles from Pretoria
Close friend Claire Taylor invited local paper the Middleburg Observer into the hospital to photograph Sue in bed to show the full horror of what local farmers are going through. She said: 'She would have wanted the world to see what happened to her. What they did to her'



Three men appear in court accused of horrific murder of British woman tortured and shot on her South African farm as it emerges the suspects were on bail for another robbery at the time 
ACCUSED: (Left to right) Themba William Yika, Nkosinathi Yika and Lucas Makua appearing before magistrates in the small town of Belfast in Mpumalanga province

Demonstrators put up posters outside the court. The attack has outraged many people in the farming communities of Mpumalanga province



Murder rate for South African white farmers 20 times international average
Farm murders explode
In South Africa, where political leaders routinely sing genocidal songs and demonize the white Christian Afrikaners as the source of all that ails the nation, Van Wyk’s story is common.
In fact, last month saw a new record of the number of farm attacks and farm murders, known as “plassmoorde” in Afrikaans, the language of Afrikaners who are descended from Dutch, French, German and other Christian Europeans.
According to Carte Blanche, an investigative news program on South African television, there were 16 recorded murders in 46 gruesome farm attacks across South Africa in February alone.
And even that may underestimate the total, as the government buries and conceal the data, often classifying the murders and tortures as “robberies.”
Others who have studied the issue, such as specialist investigator Mike Bolhuis of Project Farm Murders, say the numbers are as high as two to three farm murders per day.
The government also refuses to compile crime data based on race, further obscuring the truth about the extent of the problems.
Since the early 1990s, when white South Africans voted in a referendum to surrender power, the estimates of farm murders range between 2,000 and 4,000.
A monument to the victims features thousands of white crosses on a hill side.
Police figures show there have been some 15,000 farm attacks in that time period.

Some blacks have also been killed in farm attacks, though the torture and brutality appears to be largely absent.
There have been dozens of recorded farm murders so far in 2017, an average of one farm attack per day, according to South African media reports.
White South African farmers are between two and three times more likely to be murdered than even South African police officers.
They are also more likely to be killed than U.S. troops serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Other farm murders
The horror of many of the attacks make the murder of Van Wyk’s relatives look tame by comparison.
In one case last month that received international attention because the victims were British, a married couple was tortured for hours on their South African farm.
Among other horrors, the attackers tied up the victims, 64-year-old Sue Howarth and 66-year-old Robert Lynn, and tortured them for hours with a blowtorch.
A plastic bag was stuffed down Howarth’s throat after her breasts were burned beyond recognition, while her husband had a bag tied on his head and was cut up with a knife.
After hours of torture, the two victims were thrown in the back of their pickup truck and dumped on the side of the road. Both were also shot.
Another victim attacked last month was farmer Trevor Rees, who was tortured on his farm in southern Drakensberg.
He was forced to drink bleach, attacked with pliers, beaten for days and finally shot.
In yet another farm attack, this one in early March, an elderly woman was tortured with a power drill, with the attackers drilling holes in her while she was still alive.
As with so many victims of the farm attacks, she was left lying in a pool of her own blood.
Terrorists burst into a house of worship. The lives of your family and friends are at stake. What will you do? How will you react? Will you have the courage to shoot back? A survivor of one of the worst terrorist attacks in history shares his incredible story in “Shooting Back,” now available in the WND Superstore.
In one farm attack in Parys that was recently brought up by the Afrikaner-dominated Freedom Front Plus Party in South Africa’s Parliament, a farmer’s testicles were cut off, cooked and eaten by the attackers.
Last March, 9-year-old Kayla Meyer was among the victims of a farm attack. The girl was beaten until she died of blunt trauma to the head.
Before that, the entire Potgieter family, including 2-year-old Wilmien, was savagely tortured to death on their farm.
Raping wives and children while the husbands and fathers are forced to watch is commonplace in the farm attacks.
Bibles are sometimes left on the victim’s mutilated bodies in what experts say is a sign of genocidal hatred.
The attacks are also increasingly moving into more populated areas.
In mid-March, a suburban home outside the capital of Pretoria was attacked, with the five victims tied up and then repeatedly stabbed. Just one survived.
In February 2014, Henk de Villiers was shot by three intruders.
The attackers also went for his wife, raping her and assaulting her before throwing her out the window and repeatedly kicking and striking her lifeless body.
Five police cars arrived at the scene of the crime, thinking that the farmer had shot black intruders, Ben Van Dyk, the son-in-law, told WND in a phone interview.
When they realized it was the other way around – the white farmer had been murdered by black attackers – “they just turned around and went back to the police station,” said Van Dyk, who works in South Africa’s booming private security sector.
“It’s been three years, and we still have not heard a word from the South African Police Service,” he added. “Nothing.”
It actually was the second attack on his in-laws’ farm. They had survived the first one, though the mother-in-law was shot in the hand and the father-in-law was stabbed.
One attacker was caught after the first attack. Some of the other attackers came to court and sat among the spectators, Van Dyk said, and when his parents-in-law pointed them out, authorities ignored them.
Relatives are afraid to pursue the case further, he said.
“All the politicians here, they are stirring up hatred against the whites, and it’s very dangerous,” Van Dyk told WND in a phone interview.
He believes powerful forces within and outside South Africa are plotting to exterminate the European-descent Afrikaner people.
When WND put out a request for interviews with survivors or family members of victims of farm attacks, there was an overwhelming response, with dozens of stories of unimaginable tragedy pouring in.
Ruling party: Bury them alive

Authorities in South Africa not only do not seem motivated to crack down on the savage crimes, they actually appear to be encouraging them.
During a discussion about the farm murders in Parliament on March 14, for example, Deputy Minister of Higher Education Mduduzi Manana, a member of the ruling African National Congress, shouted: “Bury them alive.”
Incitement to murder is a crime in South Africa, and multiple political figures have called for Manana to face charges and disciplinary measures.
“If Manana is a supporter of the brutal killing of fellow South African citizens, he does not belong in government, he belongs in jail,” said Front National spokesman Daniël Lötter. “Suspend him now!”
Eugene Brink, a political analyst at the Solidarity Research Institute, drew parallels with other genocides that have occurred in Africa.
“By his statements he concedes that the lives of farmers are worth nothing and that they do not have the constitutionally guaranteed right to life,” Brink said. “Statements such as his and those made by other politicians such as [Economic Freedom Fighters chief] Julius Malema, are inciting violence against white people in particular.
“This is the kind of rhetoric prominent Hutu leaders used against the Tutsi minority in the run up to the genocide in Rwanda,” Brink added. “It soon became more common and acceptable until it resulted in one of the worst ever genocides when about 800,000 people were killed in three months.”
But such remarks from leading members of the ANC, which rules South Africa in an alliance with the Communist Party, are hardly new.
In fact, even South African President Zuma, who leads the ANC and joined the Soviet-backed Communist Party when both parties were involved in terrorism against civilians, proudly sings genocidal songs calling for the extermination of whites – on national television.
Authorities also deliberately dismantled the “commando” self-defense units that once effectively provided security for rural areas.
Officials have also made it increasingly difficult for citizens to be armed for self-defense.
All of it points to a deliberate pattern, observers say.
Genocide watch
Even years ago, top experts on genocide warned that there was evidence linking authorities to the escalating atrocities against white farmers.
Genocide Watch chief Gregory Stanton, a former anti-apartheid activist, visited South Africa in 2012 on a fact-finding mission and warned that the nation was showing signs that precede genocide, WND reported at the time.
“Things of this sort are what I have seen before in other genocides,” he said of the murdered white farmers. “This is what has happened in Burundi, it’s what happened in Rwanda. It has happened in many other places in the world.”
Stanton also said there was “strong circumstantial evidence of government support for the campaign of forced displacement and atrocities against white farmers and their families.”
“There is direct evidence of government incitement to genocide,” he added, calling for President Zuma to be impeached for the crime of inciting genocide.
In an email to a prominent Afrikaner monitoring the dangers, Stanton noted that Genocide Watch had raised the Genocide Stage level for South Africa to Stage 6 based on “evidence that the murders of Afrikaner farmers and other whites is organized by racist communists determined to drive whites out of South Africa, nationalize farms and mines, and bring on all the horrors of a communist state.”
At the time, Genocide Watch used an eight-stage model for genocide, with Stage 6 representing the planning and preparation phase, Stage 7 the extermination phase, and the 8th and final stage denial after the fact.
Since then, the scale has changed and now has 10 stages. South Africa is now listed by the group as being at Stage 6, which is the “polarization” phase, with preparation being the next phase after that.

We returned it to polarization after the ANC expelled Malema and kicked him out of the presidency of the ANC Youth League,” Stanton said.
Others say the situation has deteriorated significantly since then.
As WND reported last month, even former South African President F.W. De Klerk, who shared a Nobel Peace Prize with Nelson Mandela for his role in dismantling the apartheid system, recently suggested that authorities were fomenting racial conflict and discrimination that threatens to eliminate the Afrikaner minority in South Africa.
“President Zuma is determined to accelerate our descent along the road to state capture, economic crisis and racial confrontation,” he said at a conference last month, adding that the current rulers were contributing to the nation “stumbling aimlessly down the road to societal collapse.”
In what some critics derided as a striking understatement, De Klerk also accused the ruling establishment of being “openly hostile” to white people based “on negative racial stereotypes.”
The attitude was creating a “negative racial climate” aimed at “taking away the legitimate economic and cultural interests of [white] citizens, based purely on their race,” De Klerk added.
If current trends and government racism continue, he said, it will “lead to the disappearance of the white minority in South Africa within the next 50 to 60 years,” the widely respected former South African president warned.
His own late wife, former First Lady Mrs. Marike de Klerk, was murdered by a black security guard in Cape Town.
Zimbabwe style terror
New evidence that has emerged this year also suggests state sponsorship of the attacks, according to South African security sources.
In a series of security camera images captured by farmers in farm attacks and seen by WND, a group of black attackers carry advanced technological equipment such as cell-phone signal jammers, presumably to ensure that the farmers cannot call for help.
Because common criminals and burglars rarely have the means or the knowledge to purchase or operate such systems, some analysts speculated that rogue members of the South African military may have provided them.
Another view expressed by WND sources was that the technology could have been provided to the would-be killers by the Zimbabwean military of genocidal Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe to the north.
In Zimbabwe, formerly known as Rhodesia, Mugabe’s regime engaged in systematic slaughter of members of another African ethnic group, the Matabele, in what critics have called genocide.
Separately, his regime terrorized whites and confiscated white-owned farms so they could be handed to his cronies, similar to what the South African president seems to envision, critics say.
Zimbabwe went from exporting food as the “breadbasket of Africa” to relying on international food aid for basic survival.
Racist land grabs, murders
Experts say the same scenario will unfold in South Africa if President Zuma gets his way.
Speaking in Parliament in early March, Zuma called for “black parties” to unite to change the Constitution so that white-owned farms could be taken without compensation to be redistributed.
“We need to take bold steps that will transform our economy, including land ownership, very fast,” Zuma said.
“We are busy amending [laws] to enable faster land reform, including land expropriation without compensation as provided for in the constitution,” he added.
Other major political forces agree, and some even go further.
Former ANC Youth Leader Julius Malema, who styles himself “commander in chief” of the racist and Marxist-Leninist Economic Freedom Fighters party, argued that “no white person is a rightful land owner” anywhere in South Africa or the entire continent.
He also publicly called on blacks to simply steal land if they want it.
“People of South Africa, where you see a beautiful land, take it, it belongs to you,” Malema said in Parliament.
Before that, he suggested that genocide of whites was coming, eventually.
“We are not calling for the slaughter of white people‚ at least for now,” he added after years of spreading genocidal sentiment. 
Malema, who was in London last year meeting with Lord Robin Renwick and other prominent figures, has also been a frequent singer of songs advocating the extermination of white South Africans in violation of the law.
Growing amounts of evidence also suggest that Malema may be conspiring with others to carry out the farm murders.
According to a recently released prisoner whose statements were aired on South African television program “Carte Blanche,” Malema is providing guns, balaclavas and cash to the attackers.
“He says you only have to murder a few farmers on farms,” says the prisoner, whose face was not shown.
Malema refused to respond to the allegations and declined to be interviewed, with his racist communist party saying he did not have time due to his busy schedule.
Some Afrikaner groups said government efforts to steal white land would be considered a declaration of war.
Others are resisting in Parliament.
But the situation is spiraling out of control, analysts say.
Racists justify torture, murder
To some racist and Marxist political figures, stealing white farms with atrocities is perfectly justified – even if the farmers are brutally tortured and murdered in the process.
“We do understand that black people are upset and angry, and rightfully so, because land has been stolen historically, and it needs to be returned,” claimed Lindsay Maasdorp, national spokesperson for the Marxist-Leninist Black First Land First (BLF) revolutionary movement.
“If black people are responding to that violence with violence, then they are well in their rights to take back land by any means necessary,” he added, seemingly endorsing the brutal farm murders as a means of taking land.
Before that, he appeared to be encouraging people to burn down white-owned farms.
“Black god needs servants in [Cape Town]: wind + matches + white owned farms,” he wrote on social media as devastating fires, likely arson according to officials, were destroying property in the Afrikaner-dominated Western Cape.
The leader of the BLF, Andile Mngxitama, also justified the farm murders.
“If you look at the gruesome manner in which farmers are attacked, it is more like a response or revenge,” he said.
“The death of these farmers is minuscule compared to the horrors that black people face,” Mngxitama added without elaborating on the horrors.
Virtually no serious historian or scholar accepts the claim that land in South Africa was stolen by whites, as the documentary evidence trail is long and robust.
Dutch immigrants first arrived to the practically uninhabited Western Cape of South Africa in 1652.

Hate speech in government and farm murders
Ernst Roets, the deputy CEO of civil-rights group AfriForum, is one of a growing number of experts who have suggested that the hate whipped up by political leaders is helping to fuel some of the murders.
“We don’t know what goes on in the mind of somebody who commits a farm attack,” he told WND in a phone interview during a trip to the United States.
“But we have people who testified under oath, who said they killed their victims because they were influenced by the ANC’s singing of ‘kill the boer, kill the farmer,'” he said, referring to one of the anti-white genocidal song sung by Zuma, Malema and other leaders. “This causes hate.”
In a new report released this month titled “Kill the Farmer: A brief study on the impact of politics and hate on the safety of South African farmers,” AfriForum documents that farm attacks tend to increase dramatically after political leaders stir up hatred against white farmers.
Speaking to WND, Roets said there were cases where it can be proved that there was a link between the hate speech of political leaders and the gruesome farm murders.
“It’s a complex phenomenon,” he said. “Some cases are politically motivated, some aren’t.”
“The biggest issue for us is we have a climate in South Africa in which violence against white farmers is romanticized by the songs, by the statements of political leaders,” added Roets. “You have people singing about shooting farmers, and farmers are being shot. That’s the reality in South Africa.”
To deal with the issue, Roets said AfriForum’s campaign was based on a “double strategy.”
First, the government should treat the farm murders as a priority crime, something it has consistently refused to do.
Secondly, communities themselves must look out for their own safety, including by creating “safety networks for farming communities,” Roets said.
“And the political climate, where white farmers are used as scapegoats and blamed for everything wrong with South Africa, we need to address that,” he added.
Part of the problem is rooted in history, he said.
In 1985, the ANC’s military wing, founded by Mandela and others, decided it would not differentiate between military and civilian targets.
The decision led to a wave of brutal murders and terrorism targeting civilians, including
black opponents of the ANC, and white farmers in particular.
“They actually decided that white farmers and their families would be targeted,” Roets said. “They never removed that policy. So we’re not saying it is still active, but it was never officially rescinded.”
The problem is not that the ANC is not doing enough.
“They’re doing nothing,” Roets said.
“In fact, we have a ruling party that once encouraged this,” he added. “Now they just ignore it or pretend that it’s not a problem.”
Real solutions must also be sought outside the box, he said.
The question of self-determination for minorities such as Afrikaners and others is becoming more relevant among minority communities, he explained.
“More and more people feel the system is not working, there doesn’t seem to be a future for this system,” he continued. “People can’t be optimistic, so I think this will become a bigger debate in the years to follow.”
Self-determination and help from abroad
As the question of self-determination becomes increasingly prominent, one political party, the Freedom Front Plus, which represents mostly Afrikaners but also other minorities, is helping lead the way.
The FF+ or FF Plus, as the party is also known, is the sixth largest party in Parliament and the fourth largest in key provinces such as Gauteng.
Party leader Pieter Groenewald has been working within South Africa and outside it to pursue self-determination for his people and other minorities, a right enshrined in South Africa’s Constitution

Speaking to WND, Groenewald said the future of Afrikaners in South Africa was at risk.
“Since 1994 there has been an alarming increase of brutal murders of farmers and farm workers, in the privacy of their farms,” he observed.
“These atrocities are committed by hateful criminal and politically motivated elements by directly targeting a strategic minority community and their farming enterprises responsible not only for food security, but which also contributes considerably to job creation, economic growth and the prosperity of the entire South African nation,” Groenewald added.
“There is no doubt that many of these crimes are motivated by hatred due to the severe torture and insidious infliction of pain before the victims are executed and should be classified as hate crimes,” he said. “These attacks are usually highly organized.”
The political leader also noted that lies and myths – the notion that whites “stole” land, for example – underpin much of the government’s “political propaganda.”
Senior politicians, Groenewald explained, “actively propagate genocide against white minorities,” with the hatred they spread serving as the equivalent of a match to dry fields that could “set South Africa alight.”
The international average murder rate is 7 per 100,000, he noted. “In the case of mainly white farmers in South Africa, the figure is a staggering 133 per 100,000,” Groenewald said.

“Many observers therefore believe this comprises genocide,” he added.
Beyond the murders, though, are systematic efforts to discriminate against and destroy the minority community.
“In the last two decades, laws like Affirmative Action and Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment has forced the Afrikaner out of the workplace, denied him jobs and equal opportunities and drove him in huge numbers out of the country,” Groenewald said.
“Their language [Afrikaans] has also been a target, with Afrikaans being removed from schools, universities and the public sector,” he added.
Indeed, under the government’s “Transformation” schemes of “representivity,” which demand that all institutions be representative of South African demographics, minorities may not have majority representation even within their own cultural institutions.
The effect of it all is taking its toll on minorities.
“It is common knowledge that more than a million white South Africans have emigrated mainly for these reasons,” Groenewald said.
“Combine this with hate-crimes like farm murders and it becomes quite clear that the future of Afrikaners in South Africa is at great risk,” he concluded.
Outside of Parliament, the FF Plus is working to bring attention to the situation to the U.N. through the Human Rights Council and the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO).
Support from Christians around the world would also be helpful, Groenewald added.
“We believe Christianity is a strong binding force for people worldwide sharing the Christian religion, and in particular in Western countries,” he said.
“Christians, specifically in strong evangelical countries like the USA, can also play a very important role in assisting Afrikaners and other suppressed minorities similar to the one they play in their relationship with Israel.”
He called for American Christians to help spread the message of the atrocities taking place in South Africa “wide and far.”

Another way to help is by lobbying Congress to “to take note of the atrocities and to investigate the South African government in this respect and to apply pressure on the government to acknowledge all minorities’ right to life and self-determination.”

Finally, he recommended getting involved in projects to establish social development and entrepreneurial projects to alleviate the economic plight of the Afrikaners and other minorities who face official discrimination.

Preparing for worse to come

As WND reported last month, with the hate and violence being inflamed daily among the populace by political leaders, and with economic conditions deteriorating, thousands of Christian Afrikaners have joined a non-violent Christian preparedness group known as the Suidlanders.

The idea is to escape from the cities to rural farms with the women and children and claim protection under international law in the event of a civil war or societal collapse – assuming their farms have not been seized by government and redistributed in the meantime.

Two leaders of the Christian “prepper” group are currently touring America hoping to raise awareness of their plight and funds to purchase supplies for civilian non-combatants.

Anyone interested in meeting the pair or in hosting a presentation, even for only a few people, should contact the group through its website at

Neither the EFF nor the ANC responded to requests for comment from WND about the farm murders and land grabs.

Terrorists burst into a house of worship. The lives of your family and friends are at stake. What will you do? How will you react? Will you have the courage to shoot back? A survivor of one of the worst terrorist attacks in history shares his incredible story in “Shooting Back,” now available in the WND Superstore.

He called for American Christians to help spread the message of the atrocities taking place in South Africa “wide and far.”
Another way to help is by lobbying Congress to “to take note of the atrocities and to investigate the South African government in this respect and to apply pressure on the government to acknowledge all minorities’ right to life and self-determination.”
Finally, he recommended getting involved in projects to establish social development and entrepreneurial projects to alleviate the economic plight of the Afrikaners and other minorities who face official discrimination.
Preparing for worse to come
As WND reported last month, with the hate and violence being inflamed daily among the populace by political leaders, and with economic conditions deteriorating, thousands of Christian Afrikaners have joined a non-violent Christian preparedness group known as the Suidlanders.
The idea is to escape from the cities to rural farms with the women and children and claim protection under international law in the event of a civil war or societal collapse – assuming their farms have not been seized by government and redistributed in the meantime.
Two leaders of the Christian “prepper” group are currently touring America hoping to raise awareness of their plight and funds to purchase supplies for civilian non-combatants.
Anyone interested in meeting the pair or in hosting a presentation, even for only a few people, should contact the group through its website at
Neither the EFF nor the ANC responded to requests for comment from WND about the farm murders and land grabs.
Terrorists burst into a house of worship. The lives of your family and friends are at stake. What will you do? How will you react? Will you have the courage to shoot back? A survivor of one of the worst terrorist attacks in history shares his incredible story in “Shooting Back,” now available in the WND Superstore.



South African 'genocide' called 'microcosm' of what's coming to America

It’s a grim reality unfolding in the supposed Rainbow Nation each and every day. And it’s largely ignored or even excused by the establishment media.

“There is a genocide going on in South Africa right now, and it is the genocide of white farmers,” said Carl Gallups.

On a recent edition of his radio show “Freedom Friday,” the pastor hosted Alex Newman, a former resident of South Africa and an international journalist who has been sounding on alarm on the disturbing developments in the country.

“What’s happening there now is just monstrous beyond words,” said Newman. “I think genocide is a very appropriate term to use there.

“You have the organization Genocide Watch, and they put the Afrikaner minority which is descended from the Dutch, the German and the French immigrants that went down there in the 1600s and kind of became a nation of their own, at Stage Six on their genocide scale. Actually, just a few years ago, they had them just on stage before the actual extermination process because you had the president going on television singing genocide songs, openly, in front of his military at the ruling party’s anniversary celebration. It’s a dire situation.

“Can you imagine the president of a country singing ‘Bring Me My Machine Gun’ because my cabinet and I are going to exterminate a particular minority group? Any sensible person would recoil in horror as this is absolute craziness.”

South Africa was settled by both Dutch and British settlers. Since apartheid was overturned, the country has been run by a black majority and the white minority – probably less than 10 percent of the nation’s population – is part Dutch-derived (Afrikaner) and part British-derived.
Newman, an international reporter and author of “Crimes of the Educators,” said the skyrocketing crime rate against whites in South Africa and the continued government incitement against whites has ominous implications.
He criticized South African President Jacob Zuma, a former Communist Party member, as someone who “openly incites genocide.”

“He’s said before Christians are the cause of all the problems in South Africa,” said Newman. “It’s incredible. He really is inciting genocide against whites and against Christians, and people really are going out and doing unspeakable things on a massive scale against completely innocent people.”

Newman described the atrocities being inflicted against Afrikaner farmers, including torture with electric drills and blowtorches, the slaughter of women and children, the pouring of gasoline and bleach down victims’ throats and even rapes of babies.

“And no one is paying attention; that is the most incredible part,” exclaimed Newman in outrage.

Since the 1990s, there have been between 2,000 and 4,000 farm murders, and about 15,000 farm attacks. White South African farmers are several times more likely to be killed than South African police officers or even American soldiers serving in Iraq or Afghanistan. Some suggested white South Africans should even qualify as refugees and should be welcomed by the Netherlands or the United States.

“There is no other group in the world that faces this kind of slaughter,” Newman claimed. “The government not only ignores this, it encourages this.”

Newman said that when a small party that historically defends white South Africans attempted to debate the issue in Parliament, a member of the ruling African National Congress openly defended the murders, screaming: “Good! Bury them alive!”

America’s education system is being destroyed by design. Find out how to save your children from the deliberate plot to mentally destroy them in the government schools. Alex Newman exposes “The Crimes Of The Educators” available now in the WND Superstore.

Gallups asked the obvious question of what the country’s leaders think will happen once they successfully murder all the people who produce the food.

“It’s a very good question,” said Newman wryly. “We know what this produces. All we have to do is look north to Zimbabwe, where they are starving to death after the exact same thing. So you would think they’d get a clue, but unfortunately not.”

Newman suggested the reason the media are ignoring the violence against white South Africans is because journalists played a large role in creating the political climate that led to the atrocities of today. He noted South Africa had many different options during the 1980s and 1990s about how to dismantle apartheid, but the “media and the Western establishment” demanded an immediate surrender of power to the communists and the terrorists.

“There were a lot of black groups and white groups who said, no, this is a terrible idea, let’s think about this a little bit before we hand all power to this Soviet-backed militant organization that has been murdering people, that has been putting tires around black people’s necks and setting them on fire for opposing their policies,” explained Newman. “But no, the media had to have it their way … and so now we see the fruits of it, and no one wants to look at it.”

Gallups said there are ominous signs of the same kind of slow-building demonization campaign in the United States. He noted former President Barack Obama’s attempts to incite people against police officers and Christians, a process Gallups outlined in his book, “Be Thou Prepared.”
Newman agreed the parallels are there.
“What’s happening to the Afrikaner minority in South Africa is a microcosm in my view of what’s coming, or at least what the globalists and the establishment hope is coming, to what remains of the Christian West,” he said.
“In South Africa, you have this Christian minority that brought Western Civilization to what was at the time an almost uninhabited land. I think people in America have a hard time understanding this because we have a different point of reference, but the chasm between the culture of the Afrikaners – Western Christian farmers – and some of these African people groups which exist to this day, which worship ancestors and things like that, is enormous. Imagine taking farmers from Kansas and dropping them into the middle of Rwanda and saying, ‘Now you guys are going to have a democracy.’ It’s a very hard thing to understand, but you could see where it would lead.”
Newman said the attempt to force all peoples and cultures under a single system will cost Western Christians dearly.
“I think people need to realize that we’re moving toward this global system,” he warned. “The U.N. is now constantly declaring itself to be the global government. The last secretary general said the U.N. is the ‘parliament of humanity.’ So what’s going to happen to what remains of the Christian West, under this system that they’re talking about imposing on us? Well, we’ll be a tiny, outnumbered minority with no ability to control our own destiny, no ability to control our own schools and our own education and our own institutions.
“I think what’s happening to the Afrikaner community in South Africa is essentially a sneak preview of what will come to the remnant of the Christian West if we allow this all to continue.” 


No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments are always appreciated, but please do not include links.