 |
| HAITI - not much has changed |
(NaturalNews) One of the most well-known charities in the world is being intentionally elusive about how it spent more than $300 million in donations it received following Hurricane Sandy.
The independent news group ProPublica says the American Red Cross has repeatedly denied requests to disclose details about how the Sandy money was spent, claiming that this information is a protected "trade secret."
The Red Cross is so insistent about keeping this information private that it has reportedly hired posh New York law firm Gibson Dunn to fend off anyone who might try to hold the charity responsible for its donation spending.
The Red Cross did, according to ProPublica, release some information about Sandy donations to New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. But the charity has thus far withheld this information from the public.
"[W]e filed a public records request for the information the Red Cross provided to the attorney general's office," wrote Justin Elliott for ProPublica. "An attorney from the firm's New York office appealed to the attorney general to block disclosure of some of the Sandy information, citing the state Freedom of Information Law's trade secret exemption."
In its defense, the Red Cross claims that disclosing this information would breach the "internal and proprietary methodology and procedures" for how it conducts its fundraising activities. Writing on behalf of the charity, Gibson Dunn's Gabrielle Levin explained in a recent letter to the attorney general's office that full disclosure would result in confidential financial information getting leaked, as well as other private information about how the Red Cross conducts its everyday business activities.
"[T]he American Red Cross would suffer competitive harm because its competitors would be able to mimic the American Red Cross's business model for an increased competitive advantage," added Levin, comparing the work of the Red Cross to a for-profit business.
"[W]e filed a public records request for the information the Red Cross provided to the attorney general's office," wrote Justin Elliott for ProPublica. "An attorney from the firm's New York office appealed to the attorney general to block disclosure of some of the Sandy information, citing the state Freedom of Information Law's trade secret exemption."
In its defense, the Red Cross claims that disclosing this information would breach the "internal and proprietary methodology and procedures" for how it conducts its fundraising activities. Writing on behalf of the charity, Gibson Dunn's Gabrielle Levin explained in a recent letter to the attorney general's office that full disclosure would result in confidential financial information getting leaked, as well as other private information about how the Red Cross conducts its everyday business activities.
"[T]he American Red Cross would suffer competitive harm because its competitors would be able to mimic the American Red Cross's business model for an increased competitive advantage," added Levin, comparing the work of the Red Cross to a for-profit business.
Is it a charity or a business?
One might expect this type of language to come from a business selling goods or services. But the Red Cross is supposed to be a non-profit charity, which makes its use of the word "competitor" in this context somewhat disconcerting. Is this well known charity actually using donation money for other purposes besides helping those in need? It is honestly difficult to say, since Red Cross officials refuse to be transparent about how funds are spent.
The whole "trade secret" shtick is also a bit dubious, and something that Doug White, a non-profit expert who directs the fundraising management program at Columbia University in New York, says makes little sense in the realm of what the Red Cross does on a daily basis.
The whole "trade secret" shtick is also a bit dubious, and something that Doug White, a non-profit expert who directs the fundraising management program at Columbia University in New York, says makes little sense in the realm of what the Red Cross does on a daily basis.
Withholding financial information from the public, in other words, especially when it involves a major disaster like Hurricane Sandy, demonstrates a disturbing lack of transparency and accountability at the Red Cross.
"Invoking a 'trade secret' exemption is not something you would expect from an organization that purports to be 'transparent and accountable,'" added Ben Smilowitz from the watchdog group Disaster Accountability Project.
The attorney general's office, however, has affirmed the Red Cross's position. According to ProPublica, state officials have determined that key portions of the internal documents that the Red Cross has sought to redact contain proprietary information that would "put the Red Cross at an economic disadvantage."
In response to questions about how the Red Cross is paying for representation by Gibson Dunn, the charity was quick to deny that Sandy money is in any way being used. Meanwhile, ProPublica is still seeking the swift release of all Red Cross documents not deemed to contain private "trade secrets."
Article by Natural Health News http://www.naturalnews.com/045843_Red_Cross_donation_money_trade_secrets.html"Invoking a 'trade secret' exemption is not something you would expect from an organization that purports to be 'transparent and accountable,'" added Ben Smilowitz from the watchdog group Disaster Accountability Project.
The attorney general's office, however, has affirmed the Red Cross's position. According to ProPublica, state officials have determined that key portions of the internal documents that the Red Cross has sought to redact contain proprietary information that would "put the Red Cross at an economic disadvantage."
In response to questions about how the Red Cross is paying for representation by Gibson Dunn, the charity was quick to deny that Sandy money is in any way being used. Meanwhile, ProPublica is still seeking the swift release of all Red Cross documents not deemed to contain private "trade secrets."
based on
http://www.propublica.org http://www.newsday.com http://rt.com
Photo of Haiti - Daily Mail
RELATED
Red Cross tainted blood scandal
In the early 1980s, about 2,000 Canadians were infected with HIV from tainted Red Cross blood products. Many thousand more, perhaps as many as 30,000, were infected with hepatitis C.
An inquiry report concluded that ... lack of a clear policy resulted in a series of disastrous decisions, including importing plasma collected from high-risk prison populations in the U.S.; not using a test that may have caught as many as 90 per cent of hepatitis C cases; delaying the purchase of safer, heat-treated blood products for hemophiliacs out of a desire to use up the potentially contaminated products; and a failure to track down all those who might have been infected.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Where did the money raised by the Red Cross for victims of 9/11 go?
And the many problems within the Red Cross
After 9/11, the situation only worsened. The organization had collected too much blood while valuable red cell supplies went unused. The Red Cross also seemed to have more money than necessary. Americans making donations after 9/11 thought, naturally enough, that their money would go to victims of the attacks. Instead, it turned out, the Red Cross routinely set aside money from big disasters in case of future little ones—money for use by local chapters to finance their many smaller needs.
The Red Cross also wasn't working well with others. A 2002 study by the General Accounting Office, the watchdog arm of Congress, concluded that collaboration could enhance charitable organizations' contributions in disasters—a not-so-veiled hit on the Red Cross for failing to cooperate with other humanitarian organizations.
Read more
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Where did the money for victims of Hurricane Sandy go?
Red Cross spent $181,000 on luxury hotel rooms for staff with money donated to Hurricane Sandy victims.
The American Red Cross has come under fire for its slow response to certain areas hit hard by Hurricane Sandy, and now critics have a new complaint against the relief organization: It’s paying $181,000 for volunteers to stay at a swanky downtown Manhattan hotel
Read more - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/red-cross-soho-grand-sandy-volunteers_n_2137687.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Case of Haiti -
And how donations to aid agencies have not helped the victims. Who benefits?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Red Cross funding events glorifying terrorists
2013 - According to Palestinian Media Watch, Giorgio Ferrario, the representative of the International Federation of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Red Crescent Societies in the Palestinian Authority, reportedly attended a Palestinian Red Crescent event honoring convicted Palestinian terrorists presently serving time in Israeli jails.
During the event, 150 trees were planted bearing the terrorists names. Following Palestinian Media Watch’s publication of the story, the ICRC issued a statement defending the right of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society to use donor money any way that they chose.
The ICRC does not explain how planting fruit trees to honor convicted Palestinian terrorists can be considered a “humanitarian program.” The security prisoners that the Palestinian Authority typically honors includes people like Marwan Barghouti, who is serving five life sentences plus 40 years for planning four terrorist attacks against Israelis; Ibrahim Hamed, who is serving 54 life sentences for planning the Hebrew University suicide bombing, the Café Moment suicide bombing, the Café Hillel suicide bombing, and the Zion Square suicide bombing; and Salam As’ad Al Zaghal, who murdered a father of five small children.
The Red Cross has forced its Israeli equivalent, the Magen David Adom, to refuse services to Israelis living in the ancient Biblical land of Judea and Samaria and Jerusalem.
The ICRC has always enjoyed very good relations with the Palestinian Authority, yet has had strained relations with Israel. Magen David Adom joined the ICRC in 2005, on the condition that the Magen David Adom would not operate within Judea and Samaria, as well as East Jerusalem.
Some Palestinian Red Crescent workers, such as Wafa Idris, became suicide bombers, and the ICRC monitors Israeli prisons to ensure Palestinian prisoners are treated properly, while Israeli kidnapping victim Gilad Shalit did not receive the same level of care from the ICRC, despite the fact that unlike the Palestinian security prisoners, he never committed any crime.
Throughout the five years that Gilad Shalit was in captivity, the ICRC didn’t place any pressure on the Palestinian Authority to work towards his freedom. Noam Shalit said during his son’s captivity, “We demand that the Red Cross’ approach be more active and decisive. I would like to believe that they would give us a sign of life from Gilad. We are conducting ongoing dialogue with the Red Cross but it has not been much help. I did not hear them condemn Hamas on its crime against Gilad. The Red Cross has been a complete failure in this affair.”
Read more
- http://www.jewishpress.com/news/red-cross-bares-its-heart-and-soul-honors-pa-terrorists/2013/05/12/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2014 - Red Cross calls for family visits for incarcerated Palestinians only,
but not for Israelis when they were taken hostage.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
After World War II The Red Cross, the Vatican and the CIA issued false IDs to thousands of top Nazi war criminals
The Red Cross and the Vatican helped thousands of Nazi criminals - such as Josef Mengele, Adolf Eichmann, and Klaus Barbie - escape justice by providing them with false identities. They did it mostly out of ideological sympathy, or simply because they did not care.
Tribune Magazine - The conduct of the International Committee of the Red Cross in post-war Europe contrasts starkly with its nonchalant attitude during the war. It was aware of the existence of the Nazi extermination camps but refused to express outrage, claiming its mandate was confined to the welfare of prisoners of war and not civilian captives. It even lent itself to disseminating Nazi propaganda by claiming, following a visit to Theresienstadt, that its Jewish inmates were being “well treated” without questioning why they were incarcerated. Steinacher documents the intimate co-operation between the Red Cross and powerful figures within the Vatican
Read more
Book - Gerald Steinacher's book Nazis on the Run - based on research on how the Red Cross, the Vatican and the CIA saved Nazi war criminals from justice.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 2006 Israeli attack on Red Cross ambulance hoax exposed
*****************************************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments are always appreciated, but please do not include links.