Pages

▼

Saturday, September 6, 2014

THE MEDIA FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS' DIRTY SECRETS EXPOSED - Media malpractice: Censorship, self-censorship, and plain distortions in Middle East news coverage

  • Correspondent Uriel Heilman put it best. Covering the Israel-Hamas fighting, Heilman wrote that unreported Hamas censorship and press self-censorship mean the public is “only getting half the story.  And where I come from,” he added, “a half-truth is considered a lie.”
  • The Wall Street Journal’s Nick Casey tweeted a photo of a Hamas mouthpiece at Gaza’s main hospital, and asked, with “the shelling, how patients at Shifa hospital feel as Hamas uses it as a safe place to see media.” Then, with that courage and iconoclasm we hear about, the tweet was yanked.
  • Libération reporter Radjaa Abou Dagga said Hamas had offices near Shifa’s emergency room, then announced that heavies served him notice: “You will leave Gaza fast and stop work.” And, presto. Dagga’s article disappeared from “Libé’s” web page, replaced by a sniveling, self-rebuking note: Dagga’s report was “dépublié” – “depublished,” withdrawn – “at the author’s request.”
 
Would I lie to you?
 
By David Harris, Toronto Sun
 
What’s heading our way in this terrorist-bloodied world? We depend on international media to help us find out.  So it’s time to look at some dirty secrets, foreign correspondent edition.
 
Trench coats and panama hats have given way to satellite phones and moral ambiguity. An ideal starting point in understanding this media ambiguity – and its occasional, sinister undertones and implications for us – is the Israel-Hamas war.
 
The penny should have dropped well before today’s Gaza crisis. No later than April 11, 2003, in fact.  That day, CNN admitted in the New York Times that it hid and manipulated reality, though the wording was more delicately self-regarding.

 
Prior to the 2003 defeat of Saddam Hussein, CNN couldn’t reveal fully the monstrous excesses and threatening nature of his Iraq, because, said chief news executive Eason Jordan, the network’s Iraqi staff risked retaliation.
 
Problem: Jordan didn’t explain why, having been prevented from reporting honestly there, CNN nonetheless insisted on keeping its financially rewarding Baghdad post operating before and during the 2003 war.
 
Some critics concluded that an appetite for big, wartime money-making ratings outstripped CNN’s taste for truth, with some ambitious journalists playing along.
 
Have media done similar things in Gaza?
 
International media boasts its courage and iconoclasm. But while saturating us with stories about Gazans’ suffering, many journo outfits come up strangely short. Yes, we need to know about Palestinian casualties – even if Gaza’s people freely elected a Hamas government on a platform of eradicating Jews and Christians.
 
But brief mention of Hamas’ human shields is about as far as media venture into the designated terror organization’s inhuman nature and inhumane operations. Surprising, given that ISIS is a four-letter word for Hamas.
 
The result: Virtually no press photos emerge of ferocious Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other “fighters.”
 
And no MSM interest in the UN’s Palestine refugee agency’s pattern of Hamas-friendly hiring at its facilities, including of teachers in schools packed with munitions.
 
Are Hamas chiefs hiding in hospitals and mosques?
 
Extrajudicial killings of Israeli “collaborators”?
 
Gazan kids killed by a short-falling Hamas rocket?
 
Who cares? Cut to pictures of Israeli tanks.
 
Big Hamas questions have hardly been touched, especially in the early weeks of the struggle. Why? Some media inadvertently exposed the secret.
 
The Wall Street Journal’s Nick Casey tweeted a photo of a Hamas mouthpiece at Gaza’s main hospital, and asked, with “the shelling, how patients at Shifa hospital feel as Hamas uses it as a safe place to see media.” Then, with that courage and iconoclasm we hear about, the tweet was yanked.
 
You want iconoclasm? Take Libération, the French hard-left daily founded by that rolling barrage of mistresses and metaphysics, Jean-Paul Sartre.
 
Libération reporter Radjaa Abou Dagga said Hamas had offices near Shifa’s emergency room, then announced that heavies served him notice: “You will leave Gaza fast and stop work.” And, presto. Dagga’s article disappeared from “Libé’s” web page, replaced by a sniveling, self-rebuking note: Dagga’s report was “dépublié” – “depublished,” withdrawn – “at the author’s request.”
 
Fear of becoming ISIS-styled, halal-slaughtered journalists? Keeping options open for future postings on Islamist territory? A combination?
 
Fear surely rules in Hamastan. Whispered stories describe Gaza-based scribblers facing Hamas death threats, and the Foreign Press Association has belatedly condemned terrorist intimidation.
 
But maybe CNN-type ambitions are at work, too.
 
Either way, correspondent Uriel Heilman put it best. Covering the Israel-Hamas fighting, Heilman wrote that unreported Hamas censorship and press self-censorship mean the public is “only getting half the story.  And where I come from,” he added, “a half-truth is considered a lie.”
 
Something to remember when relying on media for intelligence about our future in a dangerous world.
 
Author - A lawyer with 30 years’ experience in intelligence affairs, David B. Harris is director of the International Intelligence Program, INSIGNIS Strategic Research Inc.
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
More articles on media malpractice covering the Middle East
 
Of special interest
 
Weaponizing news coverage
FORMER AP CORRESPONDENT IN ISRAEL DENOUNCES THE MEDIA for deliberately hiding facts and turning coverage into a WEAPON against Israel and the Jews - The politically-motivated mainstream media is engaged in propaganda and incitement that borders on the criminal.
Read more - http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/08/former-ap-correspondent-in-israel.html


THE MEDIA INTIFADA - FORBES MAGAZINE denounces the New York Times.
How the media not only fails to inform the truth about Gaza and Israel, but takes sides and inflames anti-Israel sentiment
Read more - http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/08/the-media-intifada-how-media-not-only.html
 
 
GAZA TERRORISTS' GUIDELINES FOR MANIPULATION OF MEDIA REPORTING - What words to use to make Hamas look good - Always call Gaza casualties "innocent civilians," even when they are jihadis

TERRORIST HAMAS THREATENING JOURNALISTS who expose abuse of civilians in Gaza  - Reporters have capitulated to Hamas harassment


PALESTINIAN OFFICIAL ADMITS HAMAS INTIMIDATES JOURNALISTS into reporting only the Hamas message  - Foreign Press Association issues strong condemnation of Hamas tactics of intimidation and interference
Read more - http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2014/08/palestinian-official-admits-hamas.html
 
 
MUSLIM TERROR-FINANCING QATAR PAYS CNN TO DISPLAY PROPAGANDA
 
MEDIA WATCH WEBSITES
Feature actual cases of media manipulation, inaccuracies, and incitement.

MEMRI - Middle East Media Research Institute
http://www.memri.org/

Honest Reporting
http://honestreporting.com/

Honest Reporting Canada
http://www.honestreporting.ca/

Camera - Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America
http://www.camera.org/

Also very recommended:  
Palestinian Media Watch
http://www.palwatch.org/
 
***********************************************************************
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments are always appreciated, but please do not include links.